Generic Unit Portraits

Contribute art for mainline Wesnoth.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Forum rules
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Dave
Founding Developer
Posts: 7071
Joined: August 17th, 2003, 5:07 am
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Re: Woudn't it be better to start with the campaigns?

Post by Dave »

luciano wrote:wouldn't it be better to have the ones needed for the shipped campaigns first?
Only if someone wants to work on them. Wesnoth development is driven by what developers and contributors want to do, not by what users want. This is a big distinguishing factor from commercial games.

David
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
luciano
Posts: 36
Joined: December 13th, 2004, 2:26 pm

Re: Woudn't it be better to start with the campaigns?

Post by luciano »

Dave wrote:
luciano wrote:wouldn't it be better to have the ones needed for the shipped campaigns first?
Only if someone wants to work on them. Wesnoth development is driven by what developers and contributors want to do, not by what users want. This is a big distinguishing factor from commercial games.

David
Of course. My intention was only to give a suggestion on where to start, in case that was needed.

Given that there are 150 or so units, and that just a handful of those have lines in the current scenarios, it makes sense to start from the few ones that are needed currently.

Then, actually, I'd enjoied playing the Dark Hordes campaign - pity the abrupt ending - and I'm very curious on how jason could draw Gwiti, for example.
User avatar
Jetrel
Posts: 7242
Joined: February 23rd, 2004, 3:36 am
Location: Midwest US

Re: Woudn't it be better to start with the campaigns?

Post by Jetrel »

luciano wrote:Then, actually, I'd enjoied playing the Dark Hordes campaign - pity the abrupt ending - and I'm very curious on how jason could draw Gwiti, for example.
"The Dark Hordes" is in limbo because - first, we are not sure if Pickslide has done art for the thing, and second - we are not sure where Circon is.

Or at least I'm not. I suppose I should actually check into that, sometime soon.
Jason Lutes
Art Contributor
Posts: 67
Joined: April 21st, 2005, 6:26 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Jason Lutes »

Elvish Pillager, in another thread, wrote:Good guys face to the right, bad guys face to the left!

:razz: but maybe you should flip the Thug line?
I did that on purpose (having the Thug line portraits face left instead of right) to mix it up some. My basic plan is to have all units of the same line face the same direction to add to the feeling of "transformation," but to switch off the facing direction from line to line.

Does this seem too inconsistent? What is everyone's preference in regard to the facing issue?
Woodwizzle
Posts: 719
Joined: December 9th, 2003, 9:31 pm
Contact:

Post by Woodwizzle »

I like the idea, variety is the spice of life.
Signature dropped due to use of img tag
User avatar
Elvish_Pillager
Posts: 8137
Joined: May 28th, 2004, 10:21 am
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
Contact:

Post by Elvish_Pillager »

Make all Lawful units face right, all Chaotic units face left, and Neutral units whichever way (or based on which alignment they're associated with --- Elves lawful, and Dwarves chaotic)
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
User avatar
xtifr
Posts: 414
Joined: February 10th, 2005, 2:52 am
Location: Sol III

Re: Woudn't it be better to start with the campaigns?

Post by xtifr »

Jetryl wrote:we are not sure where Circon is.
Hmm, seems to me that official campaigns should be maintained by the official maintainers. This is supposed to be an open source project...

If Circon ever reappears, and decides he doesn't like some of the changes made in his absence, well, he can always go back to an earlier version - that's one of the nice things about CVS.
Elvish Pillager wrote:Make all Lawful units face right, all Chaotic units face left
Boring! I definitely prefer the mix-them-up option.
"When a man is tired of Ankh-Morpork, he is tired of ankle-deep slurry" -- Catroaster

Legal, free live music: Surf Coasters at Double Down Saloon, Las Vegas on 2005-03-06. Tight, high-energy Japanese Surf-Rock.
luciano
Posts: 36
Joined: December 13th, 2004, 2:26 pm

Post by luciano »

Jason Lutes wrote: Does this seem too inconsistent? What is everyone's preference in regard to the facing issue?
What about having the portraits flipped left or right depending on the dialogues? That is, in a campaign, have the player units facing left, and the foes facing right.

The shadows may be a bit odd for the right-facing units, but that should not be too bad.
Jason Lutes
Art Contributor
Posts: 67
Joined: April 21st, 2005, 6:26 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Jason Lutes »

luciano wrote:What about having the portraits flipped left or right depending on the dialogues? That is, in a campaign, have the player units facing left, and the foes facing right.
I thought of doing something like that, but wouldn't that mean we'd need two copies of every portrait, effectively doubling their size as a game component?
Dave
Founding Developer
Posts: 7071
Joined: August 17th, 2003, 5:07 am
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Dave »

Jason Lutes wrote:
luciano wrote:What about having the portraits flipped left or right depending on the dialogues? That is, in a campaign, have the player units facing left, and the foes facing right.
I thought of doing something like that, but wouldn't that mean we'd need two copies of every portrait, effectively doubling their size as a game component?
If we were to do this it'd be done in the game's code, not by having two copies of each portrait.

I don't think we should worry about which way the portraits face. If we decide to change them later, it's incredibly easy to do so, so it's not something we have to worry about up-front.

David
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
Jason Lutes
Art Contributor
Posts: 67
Joined: April 21st, 2005, 6:26 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Post by Jason Lutes »

Completed Peasant -> Spearman line is up here.
Woodwizzle
Posts: 719
Joined: December 9th, 2003, 9:31 pm
Contact:

Post by Woodwizzle »

MAN, those are lookin' good.
Signature dropped due to use of img tag
Post Reply