can't recompile CVS since a few days
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before reporting issues in this section, you must read the following topic:
Before reporting issues in this section, you must read the following topic:
can't recompile CVS since a few days
I've did everything, including complete removal of my sandbox and downloading from CVS everything.
I get this:
rm -f ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo && : -c --statistics -o ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo ca/wesnoth-trow.po
mv: cannot stat `ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo.tmp': No such file or directory
I get this:
rm -f ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo && : -c --statistics -o ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo ca/wesnoth-trow.po
mv: cannot stat `ca/wesnoth-trow.gmo.tmp': No such file or directory
Yes, but the clean download was made using this line:
cvs -z3 -d:ext:anoncvs@savannah.nongnu.org:/cvsroot/wesnoth co wesnoth
Exactly this, as i made it a script and copied it from that file.
cvs -z3 -d:ext:anoncvs@savannah.nongnu.org:/cvsroot/wesnoth co wesnoth
Exactly this, as i made it a script and copied it from that file.
er... java runtime !?Ave wrote:The problem was that i had no gettext.
After installing 3 packages (including java runtime???) the compilation started.
you should really consider something useless has been installed

Rather, the no-gettext case has to be fixedAve wrote:Maybe some warning in the configure process could be issued about the missing gettext stuff?

gettextization
french l10n team member
french l10n team member
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 11:39 am
Rather, the no-gettext case has to be fixedAve wrote:Maybe some warning in the configure process could be issued about the missing gettext stuff?

You mean wesnoth was supposed to still compile without gettext?
Btw, the compilation is now significantly slower, it wasn't a lightning before but now it is really, really sluggish.
Yes, a gettext implementation is embedded for systems not having it natively.Ave wrote:Ave wrote:Maybe some warning in the configure process could be issued about the missing gettext stuff?You mean wesnoth was supposed to still compile without gettext?yann wrote:Rather, the no-gettext case has to be fixed
Its use can be forced with the --with-included-gettext option of configure, but this shouldn't be required, configure being able to detect if gettext is present or not.
--
Cedric