Wesnoth 1.0: Northerners vs Northerners, the basics from me

Share and discuss strategies for playing the game, and get help and tips from other players.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

5dPZ
Posts: 211
Joined: July 11th, 2006, 7:20 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by 5dPZ »

IMO, trolls serve 2 main purposes and do it really really well, that is:

Hold a mountain on defence

Or beat down undead on offense.

unless the map is filled with hills + mountain, i don't think they should be the "backbone of army" against orc (could be backbone vs undead though depend on situation)
User avatar
JW
Posts: 5047
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 7:06 am
Location: Chicago-ish, Illinois

Post by JW »

Gus wrote:are you really planning to avoid _villages_? Sounds like a sound plan ^^
I really want to 1v1 this guy now. I'll even give him 125g.

No. I think I'll just show him the "factional balance" instead.

Of course we'd have to play on 1.1.11, so I doubt he'd be up for it.

-edit-

Wolf Riders only have 50% in villages in dev. Be prepared.
LoneWolf
Posts: 12
Joined: May 25th, 2006, 10:35 am
Location: Czech Republic

Re: Wesnoth 1.0: Northerners vs Northerners, the basics from

Post by LoneWolf »

Higher Game wrote:
Orc Grunt- Mostly useless. .....
Troll Whelp- The backbone of the army. .....


I'm afraid I can't agree at all. Especially by grunts. That's almost demagogical.

In addition: Pack of assasins backed up by archers will efficiently defeat an equal amount of full - healed troll whelps (Ranged poison, good melee with 60 or 70 percent of defense and archers vs. 2 melee attacks, without ranged strike, not so good defense - that's clear, isn't it ???)
DraconicBlessing
Posts: 71
Joined: October 21st, 2006, 8:40 pm
Location: Chch, New Zealand

Post by DraconicBlessing »

Higher Game wrote:
DraconicBlessing wrote: You'll find the trolls become more or less useless later on in that campaign. They get destroyed by all the human cavalry you'll end up facing.
I'm stuck on the last stage (ok, I looked it up, since I figured it HAD to be the last one, it was so damn hard), but my 2 surviving troll warriors are my greatest asset. The biggest threat I've gone up against are the gryphons that fly in from the dwarves, and they're weak against impact, making the troll warrior ideal. Also, a troll warrior is the best bridge guard.

I only have 100 gold, so I'm most likely going to give up, since taking on 2+ gryphons a turn, along with mermen and guarding the bridge, is just too difficult. Maybe replaying the earlier 2 stages would help out some, but you know I'm not a fan of that. :P

I don't remember any cavalry in the orc campaign. I think I fought 2 or so on the first stage, but that's it.
I guess this might be considered off-topic, Higher Game, if you're referring to the scenario just after "Saving Inarix" (which I think you are), you're not up to the last stage. Perhaps Son of the Black Eye didn't have any further scenarios in Wesnoth 1.0 - I don't know. Yes, the trolls are great in that scenario, I used them and Assassins for removing the Gryphons, but later on I found they become more or less useless.
The Past never was.
The Future never will be.
There is only Now.
User avatar
Elvish_Pillager
Posts: 8137
Joined: May 28th, 2004, 10:21 am
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
Contact:

Post by Elvish_Pillager »

DraconicBlessing wrote:I guess this might be considered off-topic, Higher Game, if you're referring to the scenario just after "Saving Inarix" (which I think you are), you're not up to the last stage.
No mainline version of SotBE ever had a scenario after that one.
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
Flametrooper
Posts: 984
Joined: February 21st, 2006, 11:02 pm
Location: 0x466C616D65

Post by Flametrooper »

Higher Game: As I said in another thread, "...stop sticking your head where it will get bashed."
Higher Game
Posts: 171
Joined: August 16th, 2006, 1:01 am

Post by Higher Game »

Flametrooper wrote:Higher Game: As I said in another thread, "...stop sticking your head where it will get bashed."
It's relatively safe in between my well padded glutes, though. :P

/self depreciation is fun

Why were wolf riders nerfed so badly, anyway? They don't have a good distance attack like elf scouts and they don't have the power and resistances of cavalry. Their high village defense was a big part of their character.

The difference between 30% and 40% isn't a big deal (grunts and trolls), but the difference between 50% and 60% is very noticible.
User avatar
Zhukov
Art Contributor
Posts: 1685
Joined: November 9th, 2005, 5:48 am
Location: Australia

Post by Zhukov »

...but Flame, that was in this thread.

:P
DraconicBlessing
Posts: 71
Joined: October 21st, 2006, 8:40 pm
Location: Chch, New Zealand

Post by DraconicBlessing »

Elvish Pillager wrote:
DraconicBlessing wrote:I guess this might be considered off-topic, Higher Game, if you're referring to the scenario just after "Saving Inarix" (which I think you are), you're not up to the last stage.
No mainline version of SotBE ever had a scenario after that one.
I'll just continue to reinforce the fact that I'm new to Wesnoth, shall I?

I've only been playing the latest version - I didn't even realise that SotBE was mainline.
The Past never was.
The Future never will be.
There is only Now.
Sombra
Posts: 273
Joined: August 11th, 2006, 6:38 pm

Post by Sombra »

Higher Game wrote:
Why were wolf riders nerfed so badly, anyway? They don't have a good distance attack like elf scouts and they don't have the power and resistances of cavalry. Their high village defense was a big part of their character.

The difference between 30% and 40% isn't a big deal (grunts and trolls), but the difference between 50% and 60% is very noticible.
1. Race balance?

2. One of the most dangerous upgrade paths for pillagers?

You should really switch to the latest version.
Special note for 1.1.8-1.1.11

These versions are "stable beta" or "release candidate" versions. They exist so we can iron out bugs, but they will be very close to the final stable 1.2 release. They are generally balanced, stable, and bug-free, but we need your help to catch any remaining problems (which may or may not exist). Do not be afraid to download or play one of these later versions. The next paragraph is our "stock" paragraph about the development version, but because it is so late in the development cycle it's currently not 100% true (whereas it was very true for earlier releases).
:) Whats nice that your first post started again a discussion regarding strategy.

For the cracks out there. I could find any dedicated discussion regarding how to play specific maps, general strategies how to play clash, loris river, etc. Worthwhile discussion or will the changes in 1.2 be to big?
User avatar
JW
Posts: 5047
Joined: November 10th, 2005, 7:06 am
Location: Chicago-ish, Illinois

Post by JW »

Higher Game wrote:Why were wolf riders nerfed so badly, anyway? They don't have a good distance attack like elf scouts and they don't have the power and resistances of cavalry. Their high village defense was a big part of their character.
They cost 17 and have 1 mp over hills with 8mp.

Elves cost 18 and have 1 mp over forest, but have 40% def in villages.

Gryphons cost 24g.

Ghosts cost 20g, move 7, bats cost 13g, move 8, and suck at fighting.

Cavalry have 40% in villages and have bad movetype.

Drakes have max 40% def, aurians get 50% in villages

Gryphons weak to impact

horses weak to pierce

wolves weak to nothing

must I continue
User avatar
Elvish_Pillager
Posts: 8137
Joined: May 28th, 2004, 10:21 am
Location: Everywhere you think, nowhere you can possibly imagine.
Contact:

Post by Elvish_Pillager »

JW wrote:They cost 17 and have 1 mp over hills with 8mp.

Elves cost 18 and have 1 mp over forest, but have 40% def in villages.
Wolves' village defense has recently been reduced to match elves'.
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
Gus
Posts: 520
Joined: May 16th, 2005, 5:40 pm
Location: France

Post by Gus »

Higher Game wrote:The difference between 30% and 40% isn't a big deal (grunts and trolls), but the difference between 50% and 60% is very noticible.
lol? mind giving arguments for that? because afaict, it makes no sense.
Hard work may pay off in the long run, but laziness always pays off right away.
User avatar
Dragonking
Inactive Developer
Posts: 591
Joined: November 6th, 2004, 10:45 am
Location: Poland

Post by Dragonking »

Higher Game wrote:The difference between 30% and 40% isn't a big deal (grunts and trolls)
You are so wrong.
Elvish Pillager wrote:
JW wrote:They cost 17 and have 1 mp over hills with 8mp.

Elves cost 18 and have 1 mp over forest, but have 40% def in villages.
Wolves' village defense has recently been reduced to match elves'.
Um.. what?
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit
Angry Andersen
Posts: 205
Joined: September 15th, 2006, 1:22 pm

Post by Angry Andersen »

Higher Game wrote:The difference between 30% and 40% isn't a big deal (grunts and trolls), but the difference between 50% and 60% is very noticible.
Having defence of 30% instead of 40% will result in being hit 16.6% more often while having 50% instead of 60% will result in being hit 25% more often. So the point that the difference isn't the same is valid.
Post Reply