WHEN OH LORD, WHEN??

General feedback and discussion of the game.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Cod
Posts: 14
Joined: April 8th, 2005, 5:16 pm

WHEN OH LORD, WHEN??

Post by Cod »

When will we have the PC release of the new wesnoth???


:(
Disto
Posts: 2039
Joined: November 1st, 2004, 7:40 pm
Location: Cambridge, UK

Post by Disto »

Soon, as they said the Windows packager has been informed.
Creator of A Seed of Evil
Creator of the Marauders
Food or Wesnoth? I'll have Wesnoth
User avatar
Ankka
Posts: 594
Joined: January 2nd, 2005, 2:40 pm
Location: Finland

Post by Ankka »

Don't you cry we mac users get it usually a little later.

This is a free program, noone gets any money for this (I think) at least not the developers, they're doing this because they like doing it and want to make a good game taking their time, not rushing and releasing a buggy product...

At least that is the impression I have gotten.


IIRWIIR is what people usually say here, too.
User avatar
Doc Paterson
Drake Cartographer
Posts: 1973
Joined: February 21st, 2005, 9:37 pm
Location: Kazakh
Contact:

Post by Doc Paterson »

I keep obsessively checking back on the downloads section......


MUST INJECT NEW WESNOTH INTO VEINS.....

:x :x :x
I will not tell you my corner / where threads don't get locked because of mostly no reason /
because I don't want your hostile disease / to spread all over the world.
I prefer that corner to remain hidden /
without your noses.
-Nosebane, Sorcerer Supreme
scott
Posts: 5248
Joined: May 12th, 2004, 12:35 am
Location: San Pedro, CA

Post by scott »

Mac OS X download is available on the Kent, UK mirror right now. It takes forever for it to filter over across the pond. I know this thread is about the Windows version but I didn't want to muddy up the announcement thread.
Hope springs eternal.
Wesnoth acronym guide.
Shade
Posts: 1111
Joined: April 18th, 2004, 11:17 pm

As somebody that's used linux for 'too long'

Post by Shade »

As somebody that's used linux for 'too long' I don't feel too sorry for you Windows users :) :) :)
Note to forum users: You are in a maze of twisty little passages
Dave
Founding Developer
Posts: 7071
Joined: August 17th, 2003, 5:07 am
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Dave »

List of things the Windows packager has to do which are higher priority than building the Windows package:

(1) spend time with his brother who is visiting from Australia (in fact, I would build it now, but I'm off to dinner and a basketball game with him)
(2) work on an important project at work that is meant to be done by the end of the week
(3) walk dogs who haven't been out in a couple of days
(4) move trash from back of property to avoid fine from council

Once these things are all done, I'll get right on it ;)

David
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
Darkmoon
Posts: 90
Joined: December 20th, 2004, 7:06 pm

Post by Darkmoon »

I have quick question.....

instead of making it windows installer wouldnt it be simpler to have simply a zip file... or zip self extracting file that extracts into proper directories? Asides from other things, wouldnt that also make entire download a bit smaller?

The only thing user would have to do((unless there is way around it)), is to simply make a shortcut to wesnoth.exe



Hmph.... since i have Visual C++ i tried to compile it myself... my computer got stuck somewhere along the way((never compiled anything like that before.. so :D)), I will figure it out one day.. hehe.
Locke
Posts: 13
Joined: April 8th, 2005, 5:47 pm
Location: Providence, RI
Contact:

Post by Locke »

Darkmoon wrote:I have quick question.....

instead of making it windows installer wouldnt it be simpler to have simply a zip file... or zip self extracting file that extracts into proper directories? Asides from other things, wouldnt that also make entire download a bit smaller?

The only thing user would have to do((unless there is way around it)), is to simply make a shortcut to wesnoth.exe



Hmph.... since i have Visual C++ i tried to compile it myself... my computer got stuck somewhere along the way((never compiled anything like that before.. so :D)), I will figure it out one day.. hehe.
This idea makes the most sense to me. Someone should build the windows executable and then throw it all into a compressed ZIP folder. We don't need a fancy installer.
Programming is a lot like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life.
What do miniskirts and hard disks have in common? Access time.
Shade
Posts: 1111
Joined: April 18th, 2004, 11:17 pm

Hi

Post by Shade »

Locke wrote:Someone should build the windows executable and then throw it all into a compressed ZIP folder. We don't need a fancy installer.
Having no installer doesn't buy you much space (As most installers use compression anyway), but what you would get is "dead / obsolete / moved / reorganised" file spam... Trust me... Even if you just 'make insall' regularly you'll accumulate all sorts of fun stuff. If you just wanted a zip with updated files even that wouldn't gain you that much... While it took a while to see the .9 release (so it's a rather poor example) the % of files that get changed between releases is pretty impressive...

But if somebody were willing to build a zip with just the changed files I'm sure nobody would be offended by it... Just nobody has stepped forward to do it (This is a community project, if there is enough demand for it somebody should scratch their itch and just do it.).
Note to forum users: You are in a maze of twisty little passages
Dave
Founding Developer
Posts: 7071
Joined: August 17th, 2003, 5:07 am
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Dave »

A zip file would hardly be any smaller at all, and has numerous disadvantages. If we were to provide a zip file, we would have to provide it as well as the installer, which would only be more potentially confusing, and owuld make it take longer to deliver releases for Windows.

David
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
Locke
Posts: 13
Joined: April 8th, 2005, 5:47 pm
Location: Providence, RI
Contact:

Post by Locke »

Dave wrote:A zip file would hardly be any smaller at all, and has numerous disadvantages. If we were to provide a zip file, we would have to provide it as well as the installer, which would only be more potentially confusing, and owuld make it take longer to deliver releases for Windows.

David
Fair enough. :) I thought it just might have been easier than building the installer.
Programming is a lot like sex: one mistake and you have to support it for the rest of your life.
What do miniskirts and hard disks have in common? Access time.
Darkmoon
Posts: 90
Joined: December 20th, 2004, 7:06 pm

Post by Darkmoon »

Yup, yup...

saw a few programs already compiled and distributed in regular zips, only unzip it and its ready to run. But guess, now it does not sound like such a great idea.

EDIT: just not sure if it was understood, what I meant... that the entire compiled release of wesnoth be in one zip file that unpacks ready to run without any hassles
Dave
Founding Developer
Posts: 7071
Joined: August 17th, 2003, 5:07 am
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Dave »

Locke wrote: Fair enough. :) I thought it just might have been easier than building the installer.
Building the installer is actually easier than a zip, since I have a script which does it.

The main hard part of making a release is compiling and testing Wesnoth.

David
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
if
Posts: 18
Joined: December 21st, 2004, 10:43 pm

Post by if »

I have suggestion come to Open World... use OpenSource OS...
Post Reply