New shadow and nightaunt

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 22nd, 2004, 6:35 pm

Think they have nightstalk, this means during night getting transparency. If you apply transparency in daylight, during night they might be almost invisible, and think on one of them in a mountain with nightstalk plus normal transparency (from the point of view of the owner)

Plasticgod · Post by **Plasticgod** » September 22nd, 2004, 6:48 pm

tigrezno wrote:Think they have nightstalk, this means during night getting transparency. If you apply transparency in daylight, during night they might be almost invisible, and think on one of them in a mountain with nightstalk plus normal transparency (from the point of view of the owner)

Well, if it's possible, there could be two images fo the nightaunt, one for day and one for night.
The daylight one with trasparency only for "ethearliness" reason, visible to all.
The second one all opaque with the trasparency caused by the skill.
For gameplay it's not a real problem, for eyes it's a real pain.

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 22nd, 2004, 8:49 pm

New version of the nightaunt (no transparency, add it if you like it)

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 22nd, 2004, 8:56 pm

And here the shadow

Post by **Darth Fool** » September 22nd, 2004, 9:06 pm

How about:

Post by **turin** » September 22nd, 2004, 9:07 pm

argh! white claws make image worse than already is (for shadow/nightgaunt purposes)! argh!

Plasticgod · Post by **Plasticgod** » September 22nd, 2004, 9:13 pm

tigrezno wrote:New version of the nightaunt (no transparency, add it if you like it)

Here we go.

Darth Fool wrote:How about:

The center one would be nice for some sort of drain attack.

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 22nd, 2004, 9:38 pm

defend pose.

Darth, what do you mean with the removed mask in your edit?

Post by **Darth Fool** » September 26th, 2004, 5:02 pm

Aimed at the purpose of the removed mask in the defend pose of the original... trying to have a truly faceless unit...

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 26th, 2004, 5:51 pm

Image you edited was the attack pose, not defend

Woodwizzle · Post by **Woodwizzle** » September 26th, 2004, 6:02 pm

I really dig darth fool's edits. They seem right on to me. And I don't see what the big deal is about the units being too "hulking". They're still etheral, so it doesn't seem to me that their size really matters.

Burnsaber · Post by **Burnsaber** » September 26th, 2004, 6:07 pm

I think that they are *WAY* too hulking to be sneaky. How about removing the arms? the including of the mask should be enough chance from lv2 -> lv3.

Post by **turin** » September 26th, 2004, 6:15 pm

Woodwizzle wrote:I really dig darth fool's edits. They seem right on to me. And I don't see what the big deal is about the units being too "hulking". They're still etheral, so it doesn't seem to me that their size really matters.

thats the thing... they're supposed to look ethereal, but they don't , they still look corporeal, because they're so dang big (nothing against neoriceisgood, but his style is not well-suited to ethereal objects... he draws things too hulking.

).

Bander · Post by **Bander** » September 26th, 2004, 6:30 pm

intr.v. hulked, hulkÃ‚Â·ing, hulks
To appear as a massive or towering form; loom: The big truck hulked out of the fog.

tigrezno · Post by **tigrezno** » September 26th, 2004, 8:14 pm

What about if we move neo's shadow into a nightgaunt? now it's not hulky for a 3rd level unit