new tournament

Multiplayer Scenarios / Campaigns · Post by **Rhuvaen** » March 12th, 2007, 9:51 pm

<devil's advocate>
Why not have a 1v1v1 tournament? It would take 33% less time to complete...
</devil's advocate>

Post by **F8 Binds...** » March 13th, 2007, 12:18 am

I frown at you for that statement.

murgatroid · Post by **murgatroid** » March 13th, 2007, 12:23 am

I not only frown, but spit and froth at such statements! N3T!!

Anul · Post by **Anul** » March 13th, 2007, 8:42 am

F8 Binds... wrote:
Kalis wrote:sounds good Doc Paterson!

Anul:
personally, I think the problem with any match longer than a 2v2 is that the matches would literally take forever.
Even with 2v2 matches, a single match can take a good 2-3 hours. I can't imagine how long a 3v3 would take...
1 match= win - continue, lose- screwed. Hexcake would be the favored map there.

F8 Binds' solution is fine, another possible solution is giving more time to finish the turn.
For example in 2 vs 2 tournament we finished the 1st turn in just 1 week, we could give 2 or 3 weeks or more to play a 3 vs 3 tournament.
A sort of tournament without a fixed timetable... When finished the turn, the next one begins.
And the cute thing is that a 3 vs 3 match is so enjoying.

EOE · Post by **EOE** » March 14th, 2007, 4:14 pm

When that 1vs1 tournament will begin..?