Yet another unnecessary drake map

Sauron · Post by **Sauron** » August 8th, 2006, 8:54 pm

I meant it NE+SW vs SE+NW, drake-friendly small/mid-sized map.
size:21x21. Any balancement remarks are welcome.

Post by **Doc Paterson** » August 8th, 2006, 8:58 pm

I'd be curious to know why you want the map to be Drake friendly.

JW · Post by JW » August 8th, 2006, 9:00 pm

Sauron wrote:size:21x21. Any balancement remarks are welcome.

Take out the Oasii.

Sauron · Post by **Sauron** » August 8th, 2006, 9:03 pm

JW wrote:Take out the Oasii.

OK, but why & what instead?

Website · Post by **Sapient** » August 8th, 2006, 11:55 pm

You forgot to suround every village with canyon/lava

JW · Post by JW » August 8th, 2006, 11:56 pm

MP games with only 1 village per side I can only imagine to be very boring. Luckily for you they fill the healing role of Oasii and also add strategical depth to the map.

You don't need to take out all of them, but 3:1 Oasis:Village just seems unfair.

ps, where will Knalgans fight?

tsr · Post by **tsr** » August 9th, 2006, 12:09 am

JW wrote:MP games with only 1 village per side I can only imagine to be very boring. Luckily for you they fill the healing role of Oasii and also add strategical depth to the map.

You don't need to take out all of them, but 3:1 Oasis:Village just seems unfair.

ps, where will Knalgans fight?

From where I am laying the ratio seems to be 1:1, but it might be good to remove the oasis that is paired up with a village.

/tsr - not really knowing [censored] on mapbalancing

WildPenguin · Post by **WildPenguin** » August 9th, 2006, 2:52 am

Looks like this map is full of surprises.

There's even a fourth village tucked in beside the keep.

JW · Post by JW » August 9th, 2006, 6:37 am

tsr wrote:
JW wrote:MP games with only 1 village per side I can only imagine to be very boring. Luckily for you they fill the healing role of Oasii and also add strategical depth to the map.

You don't need to take out all of them, but 3:1 Oasis:Village just seems unfair.

ps, where will Knalgans fight?

From where I am laying the ratio seems to be 1:1, but it might be good to remove the oasis that is paired up with a village.

/tsr - not really knowing s*** on mapbalancing

OMG!!!!!

Those are old swamp villages, holy crap........I totally interpreted them as something else, wow.....um, are you using 1.0.2?
(ps, forget what I said about the villages.)

Post by **Zhukov** » August 9th, 2006, 7:01 am

JW wrote:...um, are you using 1.0.2?

Didn't you notice the mountains?

Elvish_Pillager · Post by **Elvish_Pillager** » August 9th, 2006, 12:47 pm

And the castle? My goodness, that looks downright ugly by today's standards.

Wretched Luke · Post by **Wretched Luke** » August 9th, 2006, 5:24 pm

Sapient wrote:You forgot to suround every village with canyon/lava

Yeah, I'd actually vote for replacing all of the grassland with lava.

Elvish_Pillager · Post by **Elvish_Pillager** » August 9th, 2006, 7:11 pm

That unfairly disadvantages the saurian half of the drake faction.

Sauron · Post by **Sauron** » August 9th, 2006, 10:53 pm

Played several games on it, the experience is pretty good. Especially well works cross-map team placement. No balancing remarks from payers. The remarks in the thread so far are... off topic?
Thanx 4 your time/attention though

.

Elvish_Pillager · Post by **Elvish_Pillager** » August 10th, 2006, 10:45 am

Sauron wrote:No balancing remarks from payers.

I still don't get who they're paying. Who are these payers I keep hearing about?

The Battle for Wesnoth Forums

Yet another unnecessary drake map

Yet another unnecessary drake map

Re: Yet another unnecessary drake map

Re: Yet another unnecessary drake map

Hmmm

Re: Hmmm