Era names
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
- irrevenant
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 3692
- Joined: August 15th, 2005, 7:57 am
- Location: I'm all around you.
Are those eras or are those factions?Noyga wrote:Actually AFAIK "most new eras" = The Imperial era, while a lot more new eras (Snow dwarves, Marsh, Extended, Peasant,...) don't even do an assumption of the place nor the time.
I figured an era was a particular grouping of factions and setting.
Want to post a Wesnoth idea? Great! Read these:
Frequently Posted Ideas Thread
Giving your idea the best chance of acceptance
Frequently Posted Ideas Thread
Giving your idea the best chance of acceptance
This is what I consider an era, thus my exclusion of many "eras". I think an era has to create new factions and group them together in some logical way. But technically an era can just be a single faction grouped with the default era for testing purposes.irrevenant wrote:I figured an era was a particular grouping of factions and setting.
For I am Turin Turambar - Master of Doom, by doom mastered. On permanent Wesbreak. Will not respond to private messages. Sorry!
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
Most notably these are also the two that have had the most people working on them, with more time and effort put it. I find that this often makes for a much better era than one guy making a basic faction*, and then sticking it onto default. In fact, these are also the two whose development process was closest to what I would guess that defaults was like, that and their creator (and any contributors) didn't give up half way.turin wrote:So, basically, from now on when I refer to "new eras", I mean the Imperial Era dn the Era of Myths. Because those are the only two I consider worth talking about.
*basic meaning only standing frames, bad art, and hardly any balancing.