Release Notes License
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Release Notes License
What license is used at http://www.wesnoth.org/start/1.0/ ?
Seems that it has a copyright (Copyright © 2003-2005 The Battle for Wesnoth)... Can I copy and paste it in other sites (forums, .etc)?
Is it under GNU Free Documentation License (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html?
Thanks a lot
Seems that it has a copyright (Copyright © 2003-2005 The Battle for Wesnoth)... Can I copy and paste it in other sites (forums, .etc)?
Is it under GNU Free Documentation License (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html?
Thanks a lot

Signature dropped due to use of img tag
Re: Release Notes License
God I hope its not under the GFDL, as that license fails to meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines, and would make the documentation unsuitable for inclusion in Debian.
"When a man is tired of Ankh-Morpork, he is tired of ankle-deep slurry" -- Catroaster
Legal, free live music: Surf Coasters at Double Down Saloon, Las Vegas on 2005-03-06. Tight, high-energy Japanese Surf-Rock.
Legal, free live music: Surf Coasters at Double Down Saloon, Las Vegas on 2005-03-06. Tight, high-energy Japanese Surf-Rock.
IMHO, derived works (images, screen copies, scenario abstracts, etc) should not fall into the public domain.Dave wrote:Good question. I tend to think we should publish website data such as that without a copyright notice and allow it to fall into the public domain. Any other opinions on the matter?
If you want to, you have to contact theyre authors to change the licence.
I think at the moment the stuff that is in the forum has to be under the GPL or marked if it is not GPL. But the forum is not the same as the website. On the site (and the wiki) there are infos about the game, how-to's and stuff like that. These are free for use. I think that texts like the announcement/release notes are of course free.lwa wrote: IMHO, derived works (images, screen copies, scenario abstracts, etc) should not fall into the public domain.
If you want to, you have to contact theyre authors to change the licence.
And where is the license marked on the website? If there counts anything beside "free-for-all" or GPL the author has to mark it.
I don't think doing that really makes it public domain. For countries that have aligned their law with the Berne Convention, you don't need a copyright notice for something to be copyrighted.Dave wrote:Good question. I tend to think we should publish website data such as that without a copyright notice and allow it to fall into the public domain. Any other opinions on the matter?
I think if you want people to be able to reuse the documentation in derivative works, it would be best to put up some sort of notice.