Idea for Far East Faction

It's not easy creating an entire faction or era. Post your work and collaborate in this forum.

Moderator: Forum Moderators

Post Reply
Seiryu
Posts: 296
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: ...

Post by Seiryu »

Cuyo Quiz wrote:Fine creepy chariot.
same here.
The N'EX is in my blood.

[Off from Wesnoth]
User avatar
turin
Lord of the East
Posts: 11662
Joined: January 11th, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by turin »

Just make sure you didn't use any copyrighted stuff. That would be bad, since it would mean it is illegal to upload it to the campaign server.

And, if you took anything directly from the art Sieryu posted, you'll have to redo the art, since I really doubt he has the copyright to those images.
For I am Turin Turambar - Master of Doom, by doom mastered. On permanent Wesbreak. Will not respond to private messages. Sorry!
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
User avatar
appleide
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2003, 10:03 pm
Location: Sydney,OZ

Post by appleide »

umm. all the art was from Seiryu.... so I should delete it all?

the chariot was made of two of the nemedian horseman's horse and a picture of chariot that I changed till they were unidentifiable... guess that's copyrighted too. huh..?
User avatar
turin
Lord of the East
Posts: 11662
Joined: January 11th, 2004, 7:17 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by turin »

appleide wrote:umm. all the art was from Seiryu.... so I should delete it all?
Well, you don't have to, but I'm fairly certain the art is not copyrighted by Seiryu, which means it is not under the GPL, so it is 'illegal' to upload it to the campaign server, and probably not a good idea to use it. But I'm not 100% sure.

appleide wrote:the chariot was made of two of the nemedian horseman's horse and a picture of chariot that I changed till they were unidentifiable... guess that's copyrighted too. huh..?
Everything from the campaign server (i.e. the Nemidian Horseman) you can use as long as you release hte product under the GPL. I don't know where you got the picture of the chariot, though, and it is that which determines whether it is copyrighted or not.
For I am Turin Turambar - Master of Doom, by doom mastered. On permanent Wesbreak. Will not respond to private messages. Sorry!
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
User avatar
appleide
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2003, 10:03 pm
Location: Sydney,OZ

Post by appleide »

search for 'cold one chariot' in google images.... the first image that comes up: the half with the wheel was copied by me, then edited and stuck next to two horses.

EDIT: so is it copyrighted? I mean, you cant even tell. I deleted a spear, and 'skewed' it and flipped it, and all sorts of other things. (But thats probably why it sucks)
User avatar
appleide
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2003, 10:03 pm
Location: Sydney,OZ

Post by appleide »

Temuchin Khan wrote:
Kafka wrote:I think you have a good idea. I was weary to make stats for a crossbowman, or a bowman at all, beause even though it could fit, the faction balance would come into play, and other factions have them. However, it is true that the Chinese were inventive, and way ahead of their time with certain weapons and tactics. There could be a unit with chinese fireworks, or even a wooden fire breathing beast, made by armies as early as the romance era in china. I dunno though, what does everyone think?
I'd be all for something like that. I had another idea, but I suspect the developers would nix it since they don't want any artillery.

Maybe if we make a unit to reflect Chinese inventiveness it should be:

fire lance -> flame lance -> flamethrower

Low health and resistances, devastating fire attack
They had rockets as early as 600 AD

(which is abasically a wooden stick inside a gunpowder cylinder wich fires by lighting the fuse, and the 'arrow' packs a lot of punch and can set fires) or the arrows shot by archers or crossbowman, propelled further by gunpowder, or the tube where a giant wooden stick is fired by gunpowder rather like a cannon. but this last one was invented later.

A unit would Probably just be an archer with a fire ranged attack 6-3 and a 6-2 melee.

Though I did recall them having flamethrowers... think it was on ships only, and stopped using them after a battle when the fire was blown back on the ships by wind.

Also there was a rocket rack that can fire 1000 rockets every minute with range up to 100 or 200 yards (could be 500, memory fading).

And if you want a unit for THAT, then, I dunno, never had siege engines in wesnoth before.


And the chinese, koreans and japanese were one of the first to fight a war with muskets. (in 1590 though, so its irrelevant) The Japanese invaded Korea with mainly with muskets, and Koreans only had cavalry and spearman and only a single regiment of musketeers , and the assitance by the chinese in the beginning wasnt great either, so they lost the land battle. But in the end the koreans won because their navy was superior (IRONCLADS!! with twelve broadside cannons!!) with a superior admiral. The navy destroyed the japanese's supply lines and forced a retreat.

Although none of that is relevant. I just like telling stories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Year_War

Anyways, here's a link, in case what I said was incoherent. :lol:
User avatar
Temuchin Khan
Posts: 1845
Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 6:35 pm
Location: Player 6 on the original Agaia map

Post by Temuchin Khan »

I'm trying to cut back on my involvement in the forums, now that I'm (a) finishing my theology degree and (b) teaching philosophy. Nonetheless, right now, I still have time for this:
appleide wrote:They had rockets as early as 600 AD (which is abasically a wooden stick inside a gunpowder cylinder wich fires by lighting the fuse, and the 'arrow' packs a lot of punch and can set fires) or the arrows shot by archers or crossbowman, propelled further by gunpowder, or the tube where a giant wooden stick is fired by gunpowder rather like a cannon. but this last one was invented later.

A unit would Probably just be an archer with a fire ranged attack 6-3 and a 6-2 melee.

Though I did recall them having flamethrowers... think it was on ships only, and stopped using them after a battle when the fire was blown back on the ships by wind.

Also there was a rocket rack that can fire 1000 rockets every minute with range up to 100 or 200 yards (could be 500, memory fading).
Yes, and they also had the "fire lance," which was a small flamethrower tied to a spear which would let out a jet of flame for about five minutes, think.

Anyway, you can read all about it in *Ancient Inventions* by Peter James and Nick Thorpe.
appleide wrote:And the chinese, koreans and japanese were one of the first to fight a war with muskets. (in 1590 though, so its irrelevant) The Japanese invaded Korea with mainly with muskets, and Koreans only had cavalry and spearman and only a single regiment of musketeers , and the assitance by the chinese in the beginning wasnt great either, so they lost the land battle. But in the end the koreans won because their navy was superior (IRONCLADS!! with twelve broadside cannons!!) with a superior admiral. The navy destroyed the japanese's supply lines and forced a retreat.
Yeah, I wrote a paper about this war for a History of the Far East class five or six years ago. The Japanese call it "Dragon Head and Snake Tail War", since Hideyoshi started it with grand ambitions about conquering all of Asia, but in the end couldn't even conquer Korea.

However, the Korean navy wasn't alone. China buttressed the faltering Korean army.

And the army needed Chinese support! In one incident, the Japanese and Korean armies were dug in on opposite sides of a river, and a young, hotheaded Korean officer wanted to cross over and attack. The general, however, an older, more experienced officer, insisted that this was a bad idea, and that they would get slaughtered. Then the young guy called the old guy a coward, and the old guy responded (basically), "I'm no coward! And I'm right! And to prove it, we'll cross the river and fight and get slaughtered, you'll see!"

With officers like that, who needs enemies?
Tippsey
Posts: 226
Joined: May 19th, 2005, 4:41 am

Post by Tippsey »

True they had gunpowder and many many more units which could be used but adding any units would unbalance the already planned faction. And yes art is still being worked on if you wish to help the faction contact the artist on page 9. Although you may not know it hours were spent on just balancing this faction so that one day it might be accepted into mainstream wesnoth. So tryand leave the faction alone till testing occured as things can be added then as needed.
May the drakes bloody kill you all.
User avatar
appleide
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2003, 10:03 pm
Location: Sydney,OZ

Post by appleide »

Got an idea for a campaign....

Because far east faction was based on Chinese and Japanese, maybe make a campaign like a warlord conquers whole of 'Far East' and takes control of those units... :D Then we could have the fire lance units!!
User avatar
Cuyo Quiz
Posts: 1777
Joined: May 21st, 2005, 12:02 am
Location: South America

Post by Cuyo Quiz »

I like the Fire Lance idea. Would be a very interesting cheap or branching infantry/militia (lvl0) given that everything is Monks and Samurais now.

We could have a naginata/spear guy who branches as a better one or as a Fire Lance. It also seems they don't have horseback warriors/scouts so going this way would fit.

Since the Imperial Era is actually inside Wesnoth and not a lose representation of actual history, what is exactly the background of this society that sends their soldiers-to-be to a monastery and make them fight without weapons. I remember monks learn some weapons too, so it could be an option at higher levels (just add the attack no need for ultra-branching).

Phew that was long, thank you for bearing with me and my brainstorming.
Cuyo Quiz,where madness meets me :D
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
Tippsey
Posts: 226
Joined: May 19th, 2005, 4:41 am

Post by Tippsey »

Check the noble samurai he is both on a horse and has a naginata.
May the drakes bloody kill you all.
Kafka
Posts: 65
Joined: December 23rd, 2004, 12:56 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Kafka »

i like the fire lance type idea, and the name will be explanitory. I'll take into consideration the unit balance and what people have written about it, if people want, i could make it, though it wasn't my idea, i'm okay with somebody else making it, as long as the make it balanced both as a unit and with the faction (most importantly the faction). I think it should have a weak short ranged attack with just the fire attack as the range, because they were usually normal soidiers who would fire the rockets and then go into battle, but a branch for it to have two ranged attacks could work, anyway, it's not my concept, so if people want me to do it, just ask, if somebody else wants to, props.
It's not about winning or losing, it's about how many you can take out before you go down!
Kafka
Posts: 65
Joined: December 23rd, 2004, 12:56 am
Location: Ohio

Post by Kafka »

Cuyo Quiz wrote:I like the Fire Lance idea. Would be a very interesting cheap or branching infantry/militia (lvl0) given that everything is Monks and Samurais now.

We could have a naginata/spear guy who branches as a better one or as a Fire Lance. It also seems they don't have horseback warriors/scouts so going this way would fit.

Since the Imperial Era is actually inside Wesnoth and not a lose representation of actual history, what is exactly the background of this society that sends their soldiers-to-be to a monastery and make them fight without weapons. I remember monks learn some weapons too, so it could be an option at higher levels (just add the attack no need for ultra-branching).

Phew that was long, thank you for bearing with me and my brainstorming.
I love monks with weapons, but i opted to not make them so i could make samurai, which are more well known and better liked. With all the arguments that went down, i can imaging what the (monks using weapons?) and (a faction of monks?) arguments being bi%^&y. However, if the faction doesn't work out, i could seperate the warriors and the monks into seperate fations, that would probably be a good idea....

Wait, i hope nobody reads this, then my faction will get seperated..... and it will be more balanced and cooler.... but that's more work....

WHY AM I STILL TYPING THIS?! AHHHHH!!!!!!

no, seriously, that's a cool idea, but i just want to get this done. If this doesn't get through, or if it does and i feel like punishing myself anyway, i'll make the factions seperate, that way we can see some really unique units and the balance will work out better, but as is, it's better we leave them as the same faction and limit the units...
It's not about winning or losing, it's about how many you can take out before you go down!
Seiryu
Posts: 296
Joined: October 21st, 2004, 7:38 am
Location: ...

Post by Seiryu »

Do you need some help or peoples are forgetting about this idea? I meant it would be stupid to abandon this project. It was so nice... I still meant another thing: Is there something we can do?
The N'EX is in my blood.

[Off from Wesnoth]
User avatar
appleide
Posts: 1003
Joined: November 8th, 2003, 10:03 pm
Location: Sydney,OZ

Post by appleide »

What happened to Smrgle?
Post Reply