Standing and idle animations?
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Ok, do you mean something like this with the sword? Sorry for being such a pain, I'm completely new to this
- Attachments
-
- new sword movement
- sword2.gif (1.06 KiB) Viewed 6253 times
-
- old sword movement
- sword.gif (1.05 KiB) Viewed 6253 times
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
Re: Standing and idle animations?
In both cases, the sword is moving because he's moving his wrist. Why would he be moving his wrist? The likely reason a sword would be moving is because his breathing causes his chest to expand and contract, causing the entire arm to move upwards and outwards. The mass of the sword would anchor the hand holding it to some degree, meaning the hand would move less than the rest of the arm, and the tip of the sword might move the least. (his breathing may also cause the arm to rotate. When in doubt about how things move, try it out!)
(I'm just a dev playing at kinematics here, mostly echoing beetlenaut. An actual artist might be able to explain it better, or tell you what I said was entirely wrong)
(I'm just a dev playing at kinematics here, mostly echoing beetlenaut. An actual artist might be able to explain it better, or tell you what I said was entirely wrong)
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Ah I see! So it's not the way he's turning the sword, but the very movement. Now that you mention it, it does look illogical. So I don't have to rotate the sword at all, only make it follow his arm, which should follow his chest?AI wrote:In both cases, the sword is moving because he's moving his wrist. Why would he be moving his wrist? The likely reason a sword would be moving is because his breathing causes his chest to expand and contract, causing the entire arm to move upwards and outwards. The mass of the sword would anchor the hand holding it to some degree, meaning the hand would move less than the rest of the arm, and the tip of the sword might move the least.
(I'm just a dev playing at kinematics here, mostly echoing beetlenaut. An actual artist might be able to explain it better, or tell you what I said was entirely wrong)
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
- beetlenaut
- Developer
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: December 8th, 2007, 3:21 am
- Location: Washington State
- Contact:
Re: Standing and idle animations?
That's what I was trying to say. Yes.Dunno wrote:So I don't have to rotate the sword at all, only make it follow his arm, which should follow his chest?
Campaigns: Dead Water,
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
- homunculus
- Posts: 537
- Joined: July 21st, 2010, 9:47 pm
Re: Standing and idle animations?
You might try to figure out the center of mass of the sword.
The sword looks like a cutlass or machete kind of thing, which is a top-heavy chopping sword, rather than like a fencing sword.
Therefore, the center of mass should be near the tip of the sword, 1/3 the length of the sword max, but probably less.
Then you should rotate the sword around that center of mass (along with some translation in the direction along the sword if the hand might also be pulling, if you will), or otherwise you would strain the wrist.
Try it with a heavy object if that explanation was unclear.
True, the tip of the sword should move less than the hilt.
Also, the tip and the hilt should be moving in opposite directions.
The sword looks like a cutlass or machete kind of thing, which is a top-heavy chopping sword, rather than like a fencing sword.
Therefore, the center of mass should be near the tip of the sword, 1/3 the length of the sword max, but probably less.
Then you should rotate the sword around that center of mass (along with some translation in the direction along the sword if the hand might also be pulling, if you will), or otherwise you would strain the wrist.
Try it with a heavy object if that explanation was unclear.
True, the tip of the sword should move less than the hilt.
Also, the tip and the hilt should be moving in opposite directions.
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Thanks for your comments, I hope I'm making progress.
Btw, is there any particular reason why this animation isn't committed (as a standing animation, not idle)? I've been reading through this thread from the beginning and there are so many great but half-finished animations scattered around. When (and if) I'm done with ol' grunty here, I think I'll just go and try finish some.
Btw, is there any particular reason why this animation isn't committed (as a standing animation, not idle)? I've been reading through this thread from the beginning and there are so many great but half-finished animations scattered around. When (and if) I'm done with ol' grunty here, I think I'll just go and try finish some.
- Attachments
-
- gruntstanding.gif (8.54 KiB) Viewed 6084 times
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
- beetlenaut
- Developer
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: December 8th, 2007, 3:21 am
- Location: Washington State
- Contact:
Re: Standing and idle animations?
That's a lot better. The breathing motion looks pretty good now. I'm not too sure about the cape and ribbons though: Two grunts facing each other would have them blowing in opposite directions.
Campaigns: Dead Water,
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
Re: Standing and idle animations?
I just want to say that these heaving animations are insane. They might make sense for a badly wounded unit, and that would be a way to use the frames that folks have contributed, but in general, this is really silly. Read the first several pages of this thread to see if I'm just being an irrational hater.
Dunno: I'm not trying to single you out, I liked how you tried to make an idle animation - that's cool, and the more, the merrier. The BfW engine as it is can do a lot of things, and it is only the lack of images that prevents many nifty things from happening.
But what is the point of the "breathing" animations? Might as well just have hurricanes waving the ribbons on an orc's helmet, it looks silly but so does the spearman's flexi-spear. It provides no information about anything, but it causes motion on the screen and that is what really counts.
If the thought of static images is so offensive, I hope we can come up with a better default animation than 'Battle for Asthma".
EDIT: Yes, zookeeper, of course the powers that be disagree or else these things wouldn't be getting committed. But if no one ever tells the emperor that he has no clothes...
Dunno: I'm not trying to single you out, I liked how you tried to make an idle animation - that's cool, and the more, the merrier. The BfW engine as it is can do a lot of things, and it is only the lack of images that prevents many nifty things from happening.
But what is the point of the "breathing" animations? Might as well just have hurricanes waving the ribbons on an orc's helmet, it looks silly but so does the spearman's flexi-spear. It provides no information about anything, but it causes motion on the screen and that is what really counts.
If the thought of static images is so offensive, I hope we can come up with a better default animation than 'Battle for Asthma".
EDIT: Yes, zookeeper, of course the powers that be disagree or else these things wouldn't be getting committed. But if no one ever tells the emperor that he has no clothes...
Last edited by doofus-01 on June 9th, 2013, 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
BfW 1.12 supported, but active development only for BfW 1.13/1.14: Bad Moon Rising | Trinity | Archaic Era |
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
Re: Standing and idle animations?
The powers that be disagree. Dunno what smiley I find most appropriate here, so let's try this combination:doofus-01 wrote:I just want to say that these heaving animations are insane. They might make sense for a badly wounded unit, and that would be a way to use the frames that folks have contributed, but in general, this is really silly. Read the first several pages of this thread to see if I'm just being an irrational hater.
Dunno: I'm not trying to single you out, I liked how you tried to make an idle animation - that's cool, and the more, the merrier. The BfW engine as it is can do a lot of things, and it is only the lack of images that prevents many nifty things from happening.
But what is the point of the "breathing" animations? Might as well just have hurricanes waving the ribbons on an orc's helmet, it looks silly but so does the spearman's flexi-spear. It provides no information about anything, but it causes motion on the screen and that is what really counts.
If the thought of static images is so offensive, I hope we can come up with a better default animation than 'Battle for Asthma".
At least we can turn them off, which is nice.
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Yes I was thinking about this, and since I have all of the ribbons and capes saved as separate layers it won't be hard to make a south-west variation. That is, if wml supports this kind of thing. Besides, this problem exists already, as the static base frame suggests wind direction. Edit: yes, I think it can be done. But I'd still like to hear a thumbs-up before doing sw variationbeetlenaut wrote:That's a lot better. The breathing motion looks pretty good now. I'm not too sure about the cape and ribbons though: Two grunts facing each other would have them blowing in opposite directions.
@doofus believe me, I had my doubts too back when standing animations were only a concept. But after downloading 1.10 and seeing them in game I liked them in an instant! I think devs here know what they're doing.
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
Re: Standing and idle animations?
How about this?
Edit: for some reason the sw ribbons move less. And I could have sworn I was doing it the same way. Oh well, I'll fix it.
Edit: for some reason the sw ribbons move less. And I could have sworn I was doing it the same way. Oh well, I'll fix it.
- Attachments
-
- -I say my dear Gurgadish, with wind like this I am surely going to catch a cold!
-Quite indeed, my dear Borg, quite indeed! - gruntstandingcombo.gif (14.79 KiB) Viewed 5938 times
- -I say my dear Gurgadish, with wind like this I am surely going to catch a cold!
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Alright, a small update. Anyone? I know Valkier's portraits are awesome but don't leave me here alone
- Attachments
-
- gruntstandingcombo.gif (14.82 KiB) Viewed 5875 times
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Re: Standing and idle animations?
I'm not sure the inflating chest is necessarily a good idea. While I understand that it makes it a heck of a lot more readable as a breathing animation, I don't think that his armor would allow for that kind of flexibility. Right now the chest is stretched/distorted to the point where his armor appears to be made from Spandex. I think you probably have enough leeway/artistic license here to stretch the armor a little bit, but currently I think the range of motion is a bit excessive.
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
- LordBob
- Portrait Director
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: December 8th, 2008, 8:18 pm
- Location: Lille, France
- Contact:
Re: Standing and idle animations?
In addition to the inflating chest, one thing that badly strikes me is the widening shoulders. There is no reason at all for this to happen in a breathing anim.
Shoulders accompany the upward movement of the ribcage, but the horizontal distance between them is absolutely unchanged. So, I'd say the pauldrons should move upwards by a pixel or two, no more.
Same goes for the arms, as a consequence
Shoulders accompany the upward movement of the ribcage, but the horizontal distance between them is absolutely unchanged. So, I'd say the pauldrons should move upwards by a pixel or two, no more.
Same goes for the arms, as a consequence
Want to see more of my art ? Visit my portfolio !
Re: Standing and idle animations?
Oh, I see... I only "inflated" his chest more because of beetlenaut's comments, then he even said
Was this chest movement better?
I'm a bit confused now, I feel like I'm going round in circlesbeetlenaut wrote:That's a lot better. The breathing motion looks pretty good now.
Was this chest movement better?
Oh, I'm sorry, did I break your concentration?