Corvvs' Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits: Merman Hunter
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Lines Redux
I seem to keep double posting... but i had an idea.
I could keep this one to maybe put a dwarf on later, and then make a flying one for just plain gryphons. I'll make a sketch and post it soon.
I could keep this one to maybe put a dwarf on later, and then make a flying one for just plain gryphons. I'll make a sketch and post it soon.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Lines Redux
triple post. But here's a sketch of a gryphon landing that might be a good "action pose".
EDIT: replaced with a better version.
EDIT: replaced with a better version.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
I think the pose is better, it's nice to see the wings.
- I believe it is a little too cute & cuddly though. The feet remind me of a Disney cartoon lion cub. I understand you're trying to block the crotch, but maybe the far leg could be reaching/hanging down more? - The head might also be too big (the sprite's head is big, but their proportions are often exaggerated).
- I don't think it's left arm could be completely hidden, even if it was folded.
- I believe it is a little too cute & cuddly though. The feet remind me of a Disney cartoon lion cub. I understand you're trying to block the crotch, but maybe the far leg could be reaching/hanging down more? - The head might also be too big (the sprite's head is big, but their proportions are often exaggerated).
- I don't think it's left arm could be completely hidden, even if it was folded.
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
1. yeah. I wasn't actually trying to block the crotch; I was putting the feet in a bird's landing pose, but yeah, it does serve nicely for that. I might try that with the leg, and add some really wicked looking claws.doofus-01 wrote:I think the pose is better, it's nice to see the wings.
- I believe it is a little too cute & cuddly though. The feet remind me of a Disney cartoon lion cub. I understand you're trying to block the crotch, but maybe the far leg could be reaching/hanging down more?
- The head might also be too big (the sprite's head is big, but their proportions are often exaggerated).
- I don't think it's left arm could be completely hidden, even if it was folded.
2. yes, probably is. It would also make the gryphon look bigger if it had a smaller head.
3. The left arm wasn't added yet. I shoulda mentioned that. It will be visible.
Thanks, I think I'll go ahead and fix all that.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
That's really good! I agree with the changes suggested (Most of them anyway) but to me it kinda looks like it's leg is coming out of it's armpit ... maybe the shading/coloring will change that though. Or maybe when you add the other arm it'll change ... we'll see!
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Wings are to small.
afaik portraits don't use dynamic poses, becaus they have to look good in every possible dialog-window.
afaik portraits don't use dynamic poses, becaus they have to look good in every possible dialog-window.
I don't see any problems with an elf-woman hitting somebody with a mace...
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
I believe animal/monster portraits are different, they can be dynamic and show the whole body, feet and all.
Not sure where that was stated, I think it may have been in the original troll whelp thread that got lost in the crash.
Not sure where that was stated, I think it may have been in the original troll whelp thread that got lost in the crash.
- Rex Umbrarum
- Posts: 85
- Joined: August 9th, 2008, 3:41 pm
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
I don't think they are. They're folded over so they look shorter.mameluke wrote:Wings are to small.
vivantlingvaemortvae
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Update. Lots of papers over the weekend, so probably not another for a while.
I fixed the arm a bit, but did not add the other one yet. The leg is changed, the wings are bigger and the head is smaller.
I fixed the arm a bit, but did not add the other one yet. The leg is changed, the wings are bigger and the head is smaller.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
All body parts now present! And the wings should be in better perspective now. Sorry for the lack of updates- I've been swamped in schoolwork.
Next up- a bit of anatomy work on his lower half, then feathers, scales, claws, etc.
Next up- a bit of anatomy work on his lower half, then feathers, scales, claws, etc.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Triple again.
Ignoring the above, I started some shading. Look ok? Maybe a bit too shiny?
Ignoring the above, I started some shading. Look ok? Maybe a bit too shiny?
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Oooh... I think it's good, but maybe a bit too short for a gryphon...
Check out my sprites!
- Girgistian
- Art Contributor
- Posts: 668
- Joined: April 5th, 2008, 8:23 pm
- Location: The lands of perkele
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Possibly, or the speculars are just placed wrong. Its left eye doesn't seem to be in line with the rest of the head, though. I can see it now that you've started colouring it.
For the dark gods!
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
Thanks for the feedback. I think the height is alright- I have always thought of gryphons as a bit stocky. I fiddled around with the shading a bit, though.
"we alone truly exist, ... the shadows we traverse are but projections of our own desires..."
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
Orbivm ||| The Thread of Ill-Fated Portraits
- Drake General
- Posts: 103
- Joined: July 23rd, 2007, 2:38 pm
Re: Gryphon Portrait: Posing
I see some problems with how I've always imagined a gryphon.
If somebody disagrees with me, do so. It's been a while since I've done this sort of thing, and I'm definitely not a master.
I think they're better, but possible still too short. gryphons had a large wingspan.Rex Umbrarum wrote:I don't think they are. They're folded over so they look shorter.mameluke wrote:Wings are to small.
I still have problems with it here, the forelegs look like they're halfway down it's body. When I looked at an earlier image, it looks more like you attached it more human-like than a four-legged creature.When you started shading it, I couldn't tell what was the head, and what wasn't, until I looked at a image before. The coloring is good though, even if I've always thought of them a lighter color. I've also seen some pictures with them a lighter color, and have spotted bellies(?).Corvvs wrote:All body parts now present! And the wings should be in better perspective now.
Next up- a bit of anatomy work on his lower half, then feathers, scales, claws, etc.
If somebody disagrees with me, do so. It's been a while since I've done this sort of thing, and I'm definitely not a master.
I don't rock the world.
How can I rock the world if I don't understand all of it?
How can I rock the world if I don't understand all of it?