Crash in Win-0.6.exe

Bazarov · Post by **Bazarov** » December 12th, 2003, 4:35 pm

Crash occurs when first scenario is finished, post the dialogue for completing.
Visual C++ Runtime Libary:

Runtime error!

Program: C:\Program Files\Battle for Wesnoth\wesnoth.exe

abnormal program termination

(Win2000, build 2195, just used the default Win-0.6.exe binary, and yes, I do have Microsoft Visual C++ installed on machine)
Error occured multiple times (reloaded from autosave). Had 1 'extra' unit (a Scout) will try without the unit. )

Bazarov · Post by **Bazarov** » December 12th, 2003, 5:08 pm

Crash also occurs without any units (besides Konrad and Delfie, of course).

methinks · Post by **methinks** » December 12th, 2003, 5:45 pm

Yeah I've noticed that one too already psted it in a thread started by someone else.
Now, just let us wait for Dave coming up RAGING AND YELLING WHY THE **** DID I PROVIDE YOU WITH SNAPSHOTS AND CANDIDATE RELEASES??!!??!!
*ehm* sorry :/ didn't have time to playtest all those versions

Post by **Dave** » December 12th, 2003, 5:47 pm

See http://wesnoth.whitevine.net/forum/phpB ... =3112#3112

I believe this bug is entirely my fault, as I don't think it was present in any of the Release Candidates.

David

methinks · Post by **methinks** » December 12th, 2003, 5:55 pm

To all lurkers:
I was joking, Dave is a sensible guy and we all praise and admire him, even if the bug did occur previously he wouldn't be so (c'mon Dave, put this chainsaw away, I've told them, Dave!).

Post by **Dave** » December 12th, 2003, 5:58 pm

methinks: It's no problem, I was just letting everyone know that their testing effort is appreciated, and the bug was entirely my fault

Thanks for catching the bug so quickly!

And, if the bug had been in all the RCs, I probably WOULD have come yelling exactly that :-p

David

Feldegast · Post by **Feldegast** » December 13th, 2003, 9:27 am

Dave, in the future, could you please increase the version number instead of just modifying the source package silently? Your fix is important enough to distinguish the fixed version from the first 0.6 release. Thank you!

miyo · Post by **miyo** » December 13th, 2003, 11:18 am

Feldegast,

we have clearly stated that 0.6 was hotfixed [1]. We are working on 0.6.1 but that will take few days.

There are most likely few users who have bad version of 0.6 and who have not yet updated - this is not good for us - though I think majority of users have the hotfixed version of 0.6.

- Miyo

[1] fixed without increasing version number