Rating system for user-made campaigns

[Eleazar]

No one has proposed that "bad marks" be given out

Yes they have.

Sorry, i placed a different meaning on the phrase "bad marks." I see now you meant it as "low grades" rather than a symbol to indicate bad campaigns.


As to the Poll, Wesnoth isn't run by the consent of the playing. You can make one, but it won't directly determine the course of development. Well expressed reasons are much more infulential.

[Jetrel]

It should be clear that an unfinished campaign must be judged differently than a finished one. However, in case such a voting system is going to be implemented it might be better to allow voting only for campaigns that are indicated "finished" (however that is done: version number, an option choosed by the author, etc.) since one can read from time to time unqualified coments for programs with version number 0.x.y like this: "Program is not good because lots of bugs, feature don't work, annoying ..."

Proposal-

Each campaign will have a stamp of either:
• Broken
• Unfinished
• Finished + Rating

In the UI, it will say "unfinished" or "broken" in place of the star ratings that can be given to a finished campaign. The author can submit his campaign as whichever he wants; a dev who shepherds the content will try to reflag things appropriately.

[Eleazar]

"broken" when using which version of wesnoth?

[jg]

So should I make an voting option? Or do we think Jetryl's proposal would be the final one...

jg

[joshudson]

I like Jetryl's proposal.

[Temuchin Khan]

I like Jetryl's proposal, but with one caveat:

"broken" when using which version of wesnoth?

Eleazar's objection rings true.