Unit Names

Brainstorm ideas of possible additions to the game. Read this before posting!

Moderators: Forum Moderators, Developers

Forum rules
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
User avatar
Pentarctagon
Forum Administrator
Posts: 4093
Joined: March 22nd, 2009, 10:50 pm
Location: Earth (occasionally)

Re: Unit Names

Post by Pentarctagon » November 24th, 2019, 2:27 pm

Pagawan wrote:
November 24th, 2019, 12:49 pm
Pentarctagon wrote:
November 22nd, 2019, 1:14 am
Pagawan wrote:
November 17th, 2019, 9:57 am
Pentarctagon wrote:
November 15th, 2019, 3:50 am
We're not going to be renaming core units that are used by who knows how much UMC without a very good reason, regardless of anything else.
I thought the game was committed to always improve; from units basics (hp, resistances, animations etc), the world (maps, terrain etc), GUI etc. Surely even the names could be always improved (where necessary). The Wesnoth Community have seen such changes happen (most currently on dunefolk) across various units types, especially for Ageless Era. I'm pretty sure the few Default factions wouldn't end the world if some changes were implemented.
You have to demonstrate how it would be an improvement though. In this case, changing the unit's name would likely affect many people's add-ons, and in exchange the "man" part of the name would be removed from units that can only be male in-game anyway. That doesn't seem like a worthwhile trade-off.
We all have to agree the names (and game in general) are not perfect.
The game has indicated a presence of different languages and tongues used by the various races found in Wesnoth (an example is that river Arkan-thoria *spelling might be wrong*. It has a different name to the Elves, Humans and I believe orcs too). This can be expanded to include some of this units names. The current naming trend is very much bland and unimaginative. Wouldnt it be so much more exciting and immersing to explore wesnoth while discovering units from different races, not only with good looking avatars traits etc but also unique names that tickle the players sense of adventure? :geek:
How does removing "-man" from unit names accomplish that, though?
99 little bugs in the code, 99 little bugs
take one down, patch it around
-2,147,483,648 little bugs in the code

Mawmoocn
Posts: 114
Joined: March 16th, 2019, 3:54 pm

Re: Unit Names

Post by Mawmoocn » November 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Man is originally gender neutral, so it boils down to whether you want the "-man" out.

Gender neutral, gender personality, role concentration, are the potential reasons for removing or personalizing gender specific roles, either with the "-man" or without.


The current model somehow follows race and role neutral names but, it won't apply for every unit line.

Common gender equal/neutral suffix used other than "-man", is "-er" or units having a role/profession based name.

This is apparent for Elvish units (except for Shyde, Sorceress and upgrades, Marksman, Marshal and Lord?), Orchish units (excluding Crossbowman, Warrior and upgrades) to name a few.

Shaman is valid to either male and female, and closely related to being gender neutral.
Swordsman is considered gender neutral, though most (not all) fantasy settings mainly use male counterparts to depict the role.

Depending on cultural norms, it might be biased closely to resemble on what's been used in their country/everyday life, and that may be biased to one gender or the other.

Fantasy or works of fiction, has likelihood to introduce fancy words that can influence deep immersion to novels and games if they fit the "world" they belong to.



I kinda like the idea of creating personalized gender roles like Swordmaiden (Female Swordsman) if they grant functionality or having neutral names like Dwarvish Guard(er?)/Soldier/Protector (Dwarvish Guardsman).

Basically, I like cool sounding names :lol:.

Shiki
Developer
Posts: 276
Joined: July 13th, 2015, 9:53 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Unit Names

Post by Shiki » November 26th, 2019, 1:08 pm

Don't forget that the unit names are also translated into other languages.

Using invented languages or names is not going to get well transferred into the other 10 languages.
Introduction to WML filtering and WML variables.

User avatar
Pagawan
Posts: 18
Joined: January 29th, 2014, 1:52 pm

Re: Unit Names

Post by Pagawan » December 1st, 2019, 11:39 am

I do not approach this based on gender. My argument is that these Races each have their uniqueness and identify themselves based on their own dialects. For example, I would not see a situation where the egoistic Elves would ever refer to themselves using the suffix/prefix "man" given the term maybe used by other races to refer to humans specifically. The same can be argued for the knowledgeable Dwarves who take great pride in their craft of smithing great weapons and armour.
Relate the above with real history where soldiers using similar weapons, armour, fighting styles etc, had different names originating from their local languages (Greeks & Romans).
Not every name has to be translated. For example the Japanese Samurai is simply known by that name in every language. This is applicable here.

User avatar
Celtic_Minstrel
Developer
Posts: 1568
Joined: August 3rd, 2012, 11:26 pm
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: Unit Names

Post by Celtic_Minstrel » December 1st, 2019, 5:22 pm

So basically you're viewing "man" as referring to, very precisely, a human male, while Wesnoth is using it more generically to refer to a humanoid male. It's hard to compare this with real-world usage, given that there exists only one humanoid race in the real world.

However!
  1. It's precedented for certain words to refer to a male (or female) of one of several species, and sometimes not even closely-related species. For example, "bull" could mean cattle, an ox, a whale, an elephant or a seal. Similarly, "doe" could be a deer, an antelope, a squirrel, a rabbit, a hare, or even a kangaroo. So using "man" to refer to a dwarf or elf (especially when qualified by the race name – a "dwarf man") isn't really a stretch in comparison.
  2. I haven't analyzed in any detail, but I think this usage is already precedented in works of fantasy.
  3. From a hypothetical scientific standpoint, elves and dwarves are so similar to humans that they would probably be very closely related species. In some settings you could actually argue that they are the same species. (Of course this doesn't work in all settings, and I don't know if it could be the case in Irdya.)
There does not exist in English a unique word for "dwarf male" or "elf male", or indeed for "dwarf female" or "elf female". So what's the problem with using "man" and "woman"?

Now, I'm not saying there's no room for change. If someone does propose different names for the Dwarvish Guardsman, or the Elvish Marksman, or the Goblin Spearman, or the Merman Spearman, or the Orcish Crossbowman, then maybe it could be changed. But there's also backwards compatibility to consider, as changing unit names will break any addons that use those units, so you're gonna need to also present a very compelling argument to make that change.
Author of The Black Cross of Aleron campaign and Default++ era.
Maintainer of Steelhive.

Mawmoocn
Posts: 114
Joined: March 16th, 2019, 3:54 pm

Re: Unit Names

Post by Mawmoocn » December 2nd, 2019, 6:41 am

Pagawan wrote:
December 1st, 2019, 11:39 am
For example the Japanese Samurai is simply known by that name in every language.
Based from this (correct me if I’m wrong), you want a profession based name like Pirate Leader converted to Pirate Captain.


Basically I think you want "job" names without the "-man".

Real world example is: foreman to supervisor/manager, mailman/postman to courier, policeman to cop.
Pagawan wrote:
December 1st, 2019, 11:39 am
For example, I would not see a situation where the egoistic Elves would ever refer to themselves using the suffix/prefix "man" given the term maybe used by other races to refer to humans specifically.
From my personal standpoint, if I’m fighting those creatures in real life, I won’t call them by their profession or what they refer themselves by, especially if they’re my enemy.

Like if I know dwarves are from the mountains or caves, from a neutral standpoint I’ll call them underdweller, short man with bulky things, and some people who came from far away mountains... :lol:

If hostile, I’ll be sure to refrain from acknowledging their given profession, you’d hear many insults that mock their names or given profession.

Basically, enemy A and enemy B professional (job) names aren’t final unless there’s some history involved.
Spoiler:
Edit: Actually Khalifate was recently redesign/reworked to Dunefolk and most Khalifate units have personalized untranslated (not sure) "job" names. The reworked Dunefolk, renamed most units to use profession names that are quite familiar to most "job" names

**Edit2: Added something on spoiler.

Edit3: Fixed wrong quote...

Post Reply