The Battle for Wesnoth Forums

It's fine to tweak units for practice. But try to look at what you create realistically and compare them with unit pictures currently in the game. Personally, I encourage you to continue to practice your drawing.. but try to expect criticism. If people don't like it they can say so.. and what's more...

I'd guess that even if this unit were not includied in 'standard' it might be included in another era or at least in some campaigns.

Congratulations on this picture, Ranger M.. you have progressed a lot!

Welcome and take a seat. I believe the next session should begin soon.

Indeed. Ignoring the error doesn't help much. The following scenario (For Tidings..) does load, but with errors.

A screenshot:

Indeed.. and this issue wo0uld be easily solved by not having any leader have this ability. After all, these are commanders and they are not supposed to throw their lives away to dispose of an enemy.

1) Hmm.. I don't think that's such a good idea. It isn't necessary and in multiplayer matches between people only it'd be downright unfair. Not in the least because having eliminated one player from a game is an advantage in itself. Perhaps it could be an option.. but in people vs people matches thi...

This is the one where you have to reach the elven keep right? Well, I only did this on medium, but what you need to do is get the hero to the keep. When you do so, the scenario is complete. So, recruit/recall escorts and move your hero up north protecting him with your escorts. Possibly leaving a fe...

*shrugs* It's all fine with me. I was just listing the options which occurred to me.

Indeed, as it's information added by the player it shouldn't be seen by the opposite side(s).. unless there's an option to specifically do so. Indeed, for clarity there could be three different types of labels: 1) Private labels: only visible by the player him/herself. Useful to place reminders alli...

Heh, I bet.

I'm totally cool with that. Ideas -are- cheap and most ideas might not even be suitable. But, if that's the case, then why the inevitable thumbs up/down from devs and subsequent arguments that arise from it? The fact that "good" ideas that just might make it into the game get moved to the...

JW, what is there against having an option to have a private game? If, say, some friends have decided to play with/against eachother, what's against that? Personally, I favour a colour/icon and custom description option without adding a password feature. The icon would already make it obvious it's a...

Baufo wrote:I think this poll is not really representative. No votes for 1.0.x but usually far more players on 1.0.x than on development server. Seems like this people are not around the forums.

Well, you can only speculate about that. Although I agree that it's likely.

Myself, I use 1.1.5.

No offense - But i excluded entrenchment for mages, ranged units and mages. And i said this before - im against makiing units have stronger defense. Er.. yes, I think he understood that. What I think he's pointing at is the fact that a higher defence is useless against mages (and marksmen) since th...