[engine] Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
- jaimeastorga2000
- Posts: 29
- Joined: July 25th, 2009, 12:28 pm
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
It might also do the exact opposite. Some creative and talented writers and potential scenario makers for whom coding is a barrier could be able to make some interesting new content. Besides, even if the average quality of UMC decreases somewhat, the filter of being included in the mainline should still serve to highlight the good campaings, right? Specially since there would be more campaings to draw from.xer wrote:Whilst I think its a good idea, I can't stop myself wondering if this would incrase the quantity of campaigns, and perhaps reduce the quality somewhat?
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Please be aware that the new editor will not auto-generate the code for events.jaimeastorga2000 wrote:It might also do the exact opposite. Some creative and talented writers and potential scenario makers for whom coding is a barrier could be able to make some interesting new content. Besides, even if the average quality of UMC decreases somewhat, the filter of being included in the mainline should still serve to highlight the good campaings, right? Specially since there would be more campaings to draw from.xer wrote:Whilst I think its a good idea, I can't stop myself wondering if this would incrase the quantity of campaigns, and perhaps reduce the quality somewhat?
Without any manual wml coding the results you can achieve even with the new editor are very limited.
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Oh, so theregoes any worries I might have Goodluck fabi
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
That is simply awesome! When everyone can place units in the map editor everyone can make "sieges" or a thing much better "AI with starting soldiers".fabi wrote:I am currently working on the improvement of the map editor.
I want to implement some of the features that have been mentioned here but not all.
First, it will be very hard to implement a full campaign designer that does abstract
the content designer from all wml coding.
So there is no chance for getting support for any of the pure action wml tags, at
least I will not implement it.
What is already working to some degree:
1. Placement of labels in the map editor. This will work without further knowledge about wml.
2. You can define a named area that can be used in a standard location filter when coding wml.
This is the key feature, in theory every other of the new map editor features can be reduced to this one.
But it's not doing anything without wml code that used the named area.
3. Units can be placed in the map editor now.
What is planned:
4. Support for setting overlay images ([item]) in the map editor.
5. Sound source management.
6. Setting a path/route for units to do cut scenes for example.
I think about the following features:
7. Enable fog of war to give the map designer a better feeling about how the start situation looks ingame.
(That does only make sense if units are predefined).
8. A very basic [side] config tool.
9. Village ownership management.
For an example, in a balanced 1vs1 game AI can have in the keep for an example 2 spearmans, so that can make a very different grade of dificult in the own map. And maybe in a map add a neutral faction without keep, but with a leader with no keep who only controlates the neutral units OR maybe without leader but a side to move only a neutral faction.
Example: near of the 2 players can be a group of unfriendly peasent for both and the players need to kill the peasents before can kill the other player.
Good Luck Fabi!
Creator of: Deathmatch new in 1.12 server.
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Why not just make it a bit more simpler and create terains with the items/scenery folders? Study the terrain coding a bit and it should not be too confuzzling. I've notice that quite a few campaigns do this, such as IftU. And then add a purpose for each. A few examples:
Tents and Lighthouse: Counts as Villages
Metal Fence: Counts as Walling
As for chests, I liked the earlier suggestion. X = amount of gold, but then the terrain would have to be switched to whatever it lays on (lets say on grass, it would be Cst^Gg to Gg when it is opened.)
Tents and Lighthouse: Counts as Villages
Metal Fence: Counts as Walling
As for chests, I liked the earlier suggestion. X = amount of gold, but then the terrain would have to be switched to whatever it lays on (lets say on grass, it would be Cst^Gg to Gg when it is opened.)
What? No, I am not 26. Who said that? I'm only 14. Surprised?
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Well, that is a way to solve the issue.Dagoth wrote:Why not just make it a bit more simpler and create terains with the items/scenery folders? Study the terrain coding a bit and it should not be too confuzzling. I've notice that quite a few campaigns do this, such as IftU. And then add a purpose for each. A few examples:
Tents and Lighthouse: Counts as Villages
Metal Fence: Counts as Walling
As for chests, I liked the earlier suggestion. X = amount of gold, but then the terrain would have to be switched to whatever it lays on (lets say on grass, it would be Cst^Gg to Gg when it is opened.)
The disadvantages are that Wesnoth's terrain system only supports 2 layers.
So you can't define a terrain that has a signpost on top of a forested hill for example.
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
No problem, you can put the label in a nearner mountain or in a nearner forest. The problem is resolvedfabi wrote:Well, that is a way to solve the issue.Dagoth wrote:Why not just make it a bit more simpler and create terains with the items/scenery folders? Study the terrain coding a bit and it should not be too confuzzling. I've notice that quite a few campaigns do this, such as IftU. And then add a purpose for each. A few examples:
Tents and Lighthouse: Counts as Villages
Metal Fence: Counts as Walling
As for chests, I liked the earlier suggestion. X = amount of gold, but then the terrain would have to be switched to whatever it lays on (lets say on grass, it would be Cst^Gg to Gg when it is opened.)
The disadvantages are that Wesnoth's terrain system only supports 2 layers.
So you can't define a terrain that has a signpost on top of a forested hill for example.
Creator of: Deathmatch new in 1.12 server.
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Thats a good point. Two layers might not work always. Lets say you make a signpost (Snp) on grass (Gg) with a lit subimage. Perfect example.
The next update should allow 3 instead of 2. (However, I tink this might be a leading prob to slow gaming.)
The next update should allow 3 instead of 2. (However, I tink this might be a leading prob to slow gaming.)
What? No, I am not 26. Who said that? I'm only 14. Surprised?
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Yeah, I think so.
You dont need to put the labbel exactly in the same square than you wants, you can put it in the down one, or in the upper one, or in a next one.
You dont need to put the labbel exactly in the same square than you wants, you can put it in the down one, or in the upper one, or in a next one.
Creator of: Deathmatch new in 1.12 server.
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Hmm... well I guess that Gg^Sng^l^whatever-else would be a bad idea. it would probably lead off to complete re-writing. so im thinking that to do something like a forested hill with a sighpost could be done like this:fabi wrote:The disadvantages are that Wesnoth's terrain system only supports 2 layers.
1: convert the terrain "forested hill" to a terrain with one terrain code, such as Fsthl.
2: make the signpost function like a subterrain, like the lit terrain does.
3: then put it together.
however you want to do it, you will need to go into the coding one way or another to define what the signpost will say, or how much gold there will be, and so on. Adding a function to the map editor to do this would not be used by everyone.
What? No, I am not 26. Who said that? I'm only 14. Surprised?
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Hmmm... an idea to post signpost in the map editor (maybe only decoration or when you click in them appears a message and in the map editor you should be able to write what is in the signpost)
Should be a awesome idea.
Should be a awesome idea.
Creator of: Deathmatch new in 1.12 server.
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Co-creator of: Era of Magic in 1.16 server
Developer of: Empires in 1.12 server, Ageless Era in 1.10 to 1.16 servers (but innactive recently)
Try My winning Orocia Guide
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Like... a bodyguard system? Again, more coding, becuase you just can't throw in two spearmen with any player, especially if they are drakes or undead.IPS wrote:fabi wrote: Example: near of the 2 players can be a group of unfriendly peasent for both and the players need to kill the peasents before can kill the other player.
But I do like your thinking. It crossed my mind before too, especially after playing HttT. Li'sar has a bunch of guards, so why not the player?
What? No, I am not 26. Who said that? I'm only 14. Surprised?
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
That's actually in there since a loooong time -- but you need to copy half the map into the clipboard, mirror the clipboard and paste it at the right spot (zooming out helps).Rya wrote:The only thing the map editor really needs is an integrated mirroring tool.
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
Personally, I'd like the map editor to be able to handle layers that you cam move around (so you could, say, import a smaller map into a larger one as a new layer, and then more that smaller map around on the big one). Although this would probably be way down on the high-priority list, it's a feature I think some users (myself included) might find useful.
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
Re: Idea to do the map editor more complete.
This would be quite complex to do, I even considered it at one time but it didn't make the cut. At least copy and paste in the new editor allows better aimingartisticdude wrote:Personally, I'd like the map editor to be able to handle layers that you cam move around (so you could, say, import a smaller map into a larger one as a new layer, and then more that smaller map around on the big one). Although this would probably be way down on the high-priority list, it's a feature I think some users (myself included) might find useful.