nonsense about MP versions relating to Undead strats
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Dev version isn't considered .... when talking strats.... since 99.9% of players play on stable....Stable (1.0.x branch)
That is for players that spend more time playing multiplayer than chatting in forums...
which gives +10 to blade res....
and -10 impact....
doing impact damage they are alot better than skels during the day...(1v1) at night its a close toss up of (2v1) where skels cost the price of 3 WC's except WC's lack the upkeep costs...
Last edited by DimWit on May 6th, 2006, 10:07 am, edited 3 times in total.
hey its about the posts above
We can always call Assassin. Maybe get draconian and put him in charge of bans for everyone with less than x posts, how often does he forum nowadays anyway?.I don't know what warrents a ban around here...
Cuyo Quiz,where madness meets me 
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
That should read: "The stable version is for people who spend more time playing a less balanced version of Wesnoth with out of date stats than chatting in forums."DimWit wrote:Dev version isn't considered .... when talking strats.... since 99.9% of players play on stable....
That is for players that spend more time playing multiplayer than chatting in forums...
I'll let Turin get the last words on this topic:
turin wrote:Well, no offense, but if you're using 1.0, which you probably are if [Thugs] are in your version, your input on balancing, bugs, feature requests, and basically everything is nearly worthless. That's one of the downsides of using the stable version.
I think partly the reason people mostly play 1.0.2 is they don't need to upgrade. Before you'd be forced to if you wanted to play multiplayer. Could we put a message up about 1.1.2 on the server too.JW wrote:That should read: "The stable version is for people who spend more time playing a less balanced version of Wesnoth with out of date stats than chatting in forums."DimWit wrote:Dev version isn't considered .... when talking strats.... since 99.9% of players play on stable....
That is for players that spend more time playing multiplayer than chatting in forums...
I'll let Turin get the last words on this topic:turin wrote:Well, no offense, but if you're using 1.0, which you probably are if [Thugs] are in your version, your input on balancing, bugs, feature requests, and basically everything is nearly worthless. That's one of the downsides of using the stable version.
Development releases are mentioned in the motd (message of the day) since their existance.Disto wrote:Could we put a message up about 1.1.2 on the server too.
In general argueing the balance of the stable version is pointless as it's obsolete for any development concerns.
"If gameplay requires it, they can be made to live on Venus." -- scott
Oh fine.Soliton wrote:Development releases are mentioned in the motd (message of the day) since their existance.Disto wrote:Could we put a message up about 1.1.2 on the server too.
In general argueing the balance of the stable version is pointless as it's obsolete for any development concerns.
PS. I know what motd is (I run my own server too (not for wesnoth) well not MY own, but I do the admin..... I'll shut up now.)