Naming of Humanoid Dragons
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
- Posts: 558
- Joined: February 1st, 2004, 6:17 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
Joy-kill
Sorry to do this again, but "Draconian" has nothing to do with dragons. It refers to the Athenian law-giver Draco and his severe punishments for various, sometimes minor, crimes.
So can we come up with another name for these units, if they're going to stick around?
(No doubt someone will cite some fantasy author who uses the word in this way. )
So can we come up with another name for these units, if they're going to stick around?
(No doubt someone will cite some fantasy author who uses the word in this way. )
The Eponymous Archon
the idea is that 'draco' is the latin name for dragons and so 'draconian' means 'of dragons'. this is somewhat illogical, but if it is for a user-made scenario, let them do what they want.
For I am Turin Turambar - Master of Doom, by doom mastered. On permanent Wesbreak. Will not respond to private messages. Sorry!
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
And I hate stupid people.
The World of Orbivm
Re: Joy-kill
Draconians are actually one of the 'features' of the Krynn/D&D world - a cross between dragons and men. However I think this is another reason we can't use them: using them in this context may infringe on copyright, or at the least, look unoriginal.Eponymous-Archon wrote:Sorry to do this again, but "Draconian" has nothing to do with dragons. It refers to the Athenian law-giver Draco and his severe punishments for various, sometimes minor, crimes.
So can we come up with another name for these units, if they're going to stick around?
(No doubt someone will cite some fantasy author who uses the word in this way. )
Imo large fire breathing lizards should be called 'dragons', smaller humanoid lizards, that perhaps are not fire breathing, should be called 'lizard men'.
David
Last edited by Dave on April 14th, 2004, 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“At Gambling, the deadly sin is to mistake bad play for bad luck.” -- Ian Fleming
-
- Posts: 558
- Joined: February 1st, 2004, 6:17 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
1. "Draconian" is English, not Latin.miyo wrote:Dave,
Krynn/D&D can't copyright latin.
2. Words in general are copyright-able, doesn't matter what language they're in.
3. Even if it isn't copyrighted, it still seems too much like copying or stealing.
4. In general usage, the word means something completely different from how it's being used here. Sounds like it should refer to a bunch of overly strict disciplinarians or lawmakers...actually, that would make a scary unit.
The Eponymous Archon
To miyo:
1. Draconian is *derived* from latin, in the same way as several languages borrow words and then form forms of them.
2. Nope.
There was a huge argument between Tolkien's lawyers (NOT the Prof himself) and a bunch of fans, over whether or not the Elvish language was copyrightable. The lawyers wanted to prohibit people from even DISCUSSING Elvish on the web.
AFAIK the lawyers backed down, mainly because the case was hard to get anywhere.
If the lawyers can't win their suit over a language, I'm betting nobody will sue us over words.
Still, I agree that it will sound rather unoriginal. But so will Lizardmen (see ToME and a host of other places.
Dragon, Lizardman.
1. Draconian is *derived* from latin, in the same way as several languages borrow words and then form forms of them.
2. Nope.
There was a huge argument between Tolkien's lawyers (NOT the Prof himself) and a bunch of fans, over whether or not the Elvish language was copyrightable. The lawyers wanted to prohibit people from even DISCUSSING Elvish on the web.
AFAIK the lawyers backed down, mainly because the case was hard to get anywhere.
If the lawyers can't win their suit over a language, I'm betting nobody will sue us over words.
Still, I agree that it will sound rather unoriginal. But so will Lizardmen (see ToME and a host of other places.
Dragon, Lizardman.
-
- Art Developer
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: April 2nd, 2004, 10:19 pm
- Contact:
Listen, I'm not calling them lizardmen for the sole reason that they're dragons in a humanoid shape. Lizardmen are lizards like the actual in real life critters in human shape, not to mention that people would go discuss over that name aswell since only one or two creatures edge more to lizards than to dragons (the slave and petit) I came with the name Draconian for the reason that "Draco" clearly reminds many of dragons and the -ian end is an overaly used end to names for groups (a good example in my view is Norwegian) and above all I did -not- create this topic to discuss if the name os copyrighted or not, since this remains the ART thread...so stop discussing that name? these discussions never lead anywhere and the ONLY name in entire wesnoth that could bring up copyright issues would be chocobone.
*edit* altought if Draconian already has a clear and well known alternative meaning like noted before in the topic I'll just do what I always do and find another great word for the race; but still Lizardmen and Demi-Dragons have a huge difference wich I could show easily; for example that lizardmen in my book are much smaller and have more of a "tribe" system, not ot mention that they have much greater speed overall.
And yes I'm working out the negative parts for the race, for example most level 1 units only have a ?-1 fire attack making it just a defencive move against archers instead of a true attack weapon. And they'll get a high exp rate not to mention that because they're overall stronger than other races most of them cost deeper in purse. and they can fly, but you should remember that the weight they pack doesn't make them the fastest race around. it just means they can outrun races who get stuck in bad terrain like tundra or swamp, but they'll never catch up with a horse or elf.
*edit* altought if Draconian already has a clear and well known alternative meaning like noted before in the topic I'll just do what I always do and find another great word for the race; but still Lizardmen and Demi-Dragons have a huge difference wich I could show easily; for example that lizardmen in my book are much smaller and have more of a "tribe" system, not ot mention that they have much greater speed overall.
And yes I'm working out the negative parts for the race, for example most level 1 units only have a ?-1 fire attack making it just a defencive move against archers instead of a true attack weapon. And they'll get a high exp rate not to mention that because they're overall stronger than other races most of them cost deeper in purse. and they can fly, but you should remember that the weight they pack doesn't make them the fastest race around. it just means they can outrun races who get stuck in bad terrain like tundra or swamp, but they'll never catch up with a horse or elf.
-
- Posts: 558
- Joined: February 1st, 2004, 6:17 pm
- Location: New Jersey, USA
Partly because of Neoriceisgood's comments, I had stopped commenting on the name, but since you bring it up again...
Point is that this is calling a koala a kangaroo. You can do it - you can do anything you like - you'll just confuse a lot of people (and sound a bit ignorant ).
Lizardmen seems pretty good to me, partly perhaps because I don't understand Neoriceisgood's finer distinctions.
hook wrote:i had no idea i couldn't call a koala a koala, just because some stupid bloke in japan uses them on his cookie-boxes
Point is that this is calling a koala a kangaroo. You can do it - you can do anything you like - you'll just confuse a lot of people (and sound a bit ignorant ).
I'm hot on having very normal names, just ones that don't mean something completely unrelated to the way they're being used. (I gave the centuries-old definition of "Draconian" earlier in the thread.)hook wrote:...anyhoo, i don't know what's wrong with Dragons or Draconians ...but if you're _that_ hot on not having a normal name, why don't we just invent one ...like Dreth or something
Lizardmen seems pretty good to me, partly perhaps because I don't understand Neoriceisgood's finer distinctions.
The Eponymous Archon
-
- Art Developer
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: April 2nd, 2004, 10:19 pm
- Contact:
-
- Retired Developer
- Posts: 2633
- Joined: March 22nd, 2004, 11:22 pm
- Location: An Earl's Roadstead
How about drakonian or does this still upset the purists?Anonymous wrote:I googled a bit and it seems the Latin for dragon is drago. So how about dragarion. This should translate to small dragon.
Another suggestion is drak or drakling.
"Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)"
Drake Drake, n. AS. draca dragon, L. draco. See Dragon.
1. A dragon. Obs.
Beowulf resolves to kill the drake. --J. A.
Harrison
(Beowulf).
2. A small piece of artillery. Obs.
Two or three shots, made at them by a couple of
drakes, made them stagger. --Clarendon.
"Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)"
Drake Drake, n. Cf. F. dravik, W. drewg, darnel, cockle,
etc.
Wild oats, brome grass, or darnel grass; -- called also
drawk, dravick, and drank. Prov. Eng. --Dr. Prior.
"Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)"
Drake Drake, n. Akin to LG. drake, OHG. antrache, anetrecho,
G. enterich, Icel. andriki, Dan. andrik, OSw. andrak,
andrage, masc., and fr. AS. ened, fem., duck; akin to D.
eend, G. ente, Icel. "ond, Dan. and, Sw. and, Lith. antis,
L. anas, Gr. ? (for ?), and perh. Skr. =ati a water fowl.
????. In English the first part of the word was lost. The
ending is akin to E. rich. Cf. Gulaund.
1. The male of the duck kind.
2. Cf. Dragon fly, under Dragon. The drake fly.
The drake will mount steeple height into the air.
--Walton.
Drake fly, a kind of fly, sometimes used in angling.
The dark drake fly, good in August. --Walton.
why not just call it a drake?
or just call it a dragon..looking at the images, it doesn't look all that humanoid.
anyway, if you insist on creating a new name, go with Drakonian, it has the same sound, so if you liked Draconian it will be good, but it won't upset people who want it not to be confusing. (although personally, i think making up names for a race is somewhat stupid when there are plenty of good dragon-words floating around. wyvern, drake, wurm, serpent, uru-loki (OK, thats from Tolkien), etc)
or just call it a dragon..looking at the images, it doesn't look all that humanoid.
anyway, if you insist on creating a new name, go with Drakonian, it has the same sound, so if you liked Draconian it will be good, but it won't upset people who want it not to be confusing. (although personally, i think making up names for a race is somewhat stupid when there are plenty of good dragon-words floating around. wyvern, drake, wurm, serpent, uru-loki (OK, thats from Tolkien), etc)
-
- Art Developer
- Posts: 2221
- Joined: April 2nd, 2004, 10:19 pm
- Contact:
nah turin, the deal is that those creatures all already excist;
wyvern= armless dragon creature
drake- smaller dragon-esque type creature
wurm= a snake-like dragon
serpent= the one above but for water
uru-loki=?
however Drakonian sounds good if it makes the lot of you happy, since the blunt k looks good to me, if everyone thinks this name is ok please tell me ^^
wyvern= armless dragon creature
drake- smaller dragon-esque type creature
wurm= a snake-like dragon
serpent= the one above but for water
uru-loki=?
however Drakonian sounds good if it makes the lot of you happy, since the blunt k looks good to me, if everyone thinks this name is ok please tell me ^^