Elf Portrait art thread: Archer by Ranger M
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
Before posting critique in this forum, you must read the following thread:
- Thrawn
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: June 2nd, 2005, 11:37 am
- Location: bridge of SSD Chimera
bingo! it was either that or 3/4 back view with turned head and well placed armsRanger M wrote:perfect, not so revealing that it debases the whole portrait into a flesh fest, but enough to give a naturalistic feel.
BTW her hand seems to be a ball, is this going to be some kind of glowing magic ball.
...please remember that "IT'S" ALWAYS MEANS "IT IS" and "ITS" IS WHAT YOU USE TO INDICATE POSSESSION BY "IT".--scott
this goes for they're/their/there as well
this goes for they're/their/there as well
That actually looks good, feels good too.
I hereby present my respects before this show.
*bows*
Although, IIRC, protuding ears weren't well endorsed in the Wesnothian view.
I hereby present my respects before this show.
*bows*
Although, IIRC, protuding ears weren't well endorsed in the Wesnothian view.
Cuyo Quiz,where madness meets me
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
same "curving material around round limb" problem that this fellow had:
http://www.wesnoth.org/forum/viewtopic. ... 964#130964
That said... uh... wow. You've actually got some significant potential there. Hard to believe you're the same guy who drew the earlier picture posted in this same thread.
The positioning of the facial features is close to being right, but just slightly off - nudge the eyes down a tad, and move the nose/mouth in from the side a tad. Also, her left eye (her left, meaning right side of page) is in too far; it should lie closer to the center.
The arm to the front is quite well done, actually, especially the shoulder/biceps part. The general ideas behind the fabric folding are well-done too, although some of the folds near the bottom are a bit iffy. (the two folds at the very top are spot on, and the pulling of the fabric to the rings is also well-informed. Draping of the hair is more-or-less correct.
One thing that looks bad is the legs, especially the lower legs. The stance is balanced, but the way that one leg juts in just ... doesn't look right. I suspect what's goofing it up is that the fabric superimposed on top is hanging as though the leg ain't there, and the lower leg is shaped completely wrong (do not confuse with position/orientation - those are alright). The general position of the legs .... should ... be right, although I'd be a lot more sure if all those things I noted above were cleaned up.
Good luck. Doing a good, professional job is hard, and you've got a hard way to go before then, but you have talent - keep applying the work, and you will get there. Faster than many other, less fortunate people.
http://www.wesnoth.org/forum/viewtopic. ... 964#130964
That said... uh... wow. You've actually got some significant potential there. Hard to believe you're the same guy who drew the earlier picture posted in this same thread.
The positioning of the facial features is close to being right, but just slightly off - nudge the eyes down a tad, and move the nose/mouth in from the side a tad. Also, her left eye (her left, meaning right side of page) is in too far; it should lie closer to the center.
The arm to the front is quite well done, actually, especially the shoulder/biceps part. The general ideas behind the fabric folding are well-done too, although some of the folds near the bottom are a bit iffy. (the two folds at the very top are spot on, and the pulling of the fabric to the rings is also well-informed. Draping of the hair is more-or-less correct.
One thing that looks bad is the legs, especially the lower legs. The stance is balanced, but the way that one leg juts in just ... doesn't look right. I suspect what's goofing it up is that the fabric superimposed on top is hanging as though the leg ain't there, and the lower leg is shaped completely wrong (do not confuse with position/orientation - those are alright). The general position of the legs .... should ... be right, although I'd be a lot more sure if all those things I noted above were cleaned up.
Good luck. Doing a good, professional job is hard, and you've got a hard way to go before then, but you have talent - keep applying the work, and you will get there. Faster than many other, less fortunate people.
- Thrawn
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: June 2nd, 2005, 11:37 am
- Location: bridge of SSD Chimera
thanks, but I'm glad Jetryl is so picky (and I find the legs okay, because I hate the impossibly thin anime legs people draw, so they won't change much)JW wrote:Wow, that's hawt. Other than her legs being a little too meaty, and if you're picky like Jetryl, all the stuff he said, it's just plain great!!
yah, though my horrible attampts at using what I scanned end up really bad most of the time, so I end up doing rough sketches in Gimp, then antagonizing over it for hours--pixel by pixelps, I just realized why everyone can do art so fast... THEY DRAW IT!!!
I've been doing pixel-by-pixel artwork over here.
@Jetryl: thanks for the comments--looking back I see all the problems, but not bad for 10 minutes of German class
the reason this is better than those posted above is that I try too hard some times, and thus mess things up, and I also have much more experience drawing on paper.
Also, what were is this wraparound problem? I don't quite get what you are saying.
EDIT:I've redone it on the back side of the paper, and everything is flipped (it will be scanned by around 7:30 forum-time) It is just outlined, so not as stylized as this one.
...please remember that "IT'S" ALWAYS MEANS "IT IS" and "ITS" IS WHAT YOU USE TO INDICATE POSSESSION BY "IT".--scott
this goes for they're/their/there as well
this goes for they're/their/there as well
- Thrawn
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: June 2nd, 2005, 11:37 am
- Location: bridge of SSD Chimera
she's tensing her arm, and if you do that, the muscle at the elbow joint bulges a bit, which was what I was trying to show. Maybe it's coming off wrong, but.Leonhard wrote:I find it impressive!
A few points that stroke me anyway : I found her right forearm a little bit wide compared to her biceps.
...please remember that "IT'S" ALWAYS MEANS "IT IS" and "ITS" IS WHAT YOU USE TO INDICATE POSSESSION BY "IT".--scott
this goes for they're/their/there as well
this goes for they're/their/there as well
My Elf Portrait
I truely do not expect this to get into the game. I don't even think it is suitable. I just couldn't help my elf.
- Attachments
-
- elven08.png (44.88 KiB) Viewed 3732 times
IMO, it looks a little too fake. And there's too less contrast between the colours (especially the skin).
me: Welcome to the real world. If everyone says your art and opinions suck, it's because they DO suck. Even if you're too damned proud/stupid/both to realize it.
danny_california: yep keep telling fairy tales.
danny_california: yep keep telling fairy tales.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: February 2nd, 2006, 8:11 pm
- Location: Hawaii
The overall impression is that it is an elf, but some individual features are a bit inconsistant. The ears seem darker than they should be and also not... earish... enough.
Keep trying!
Keep trying!
"I believe that God made me for china, but he also made me fast, and when I run I feel His pleasure." ~ Eric Liddel