HttT Revised

Discussion and development of scenarios and campaigns for the game.

Moderators: Forum Moderators, Developers

Post Reply
Caladbolg
Posts: 137
Joined: January 1st, 2016, 4:40 pm
Location: Hopelessly trapped within the Submachine

HttT Revised

Post by Caladbolg » June 2nd, 2018, 4:11 pm

Hello! This is a feedback thread for the 'Heir to the Throne Revised' campaign, my take on the classic HttT. The framework is basically the same, most of the changes are to the characters and the plot details.

Over a year ago I wanted to revive interest in improving HttT and I started modding it so that I bring something more than ideas to the table. However, I got carried away and instead of it being 'a few minor changes to get the community started on discussing HttT', it ended up being 'a standalone, subjective take on HttT'. Then RL got in the way and I never published it. I dug it up just a while ago and made some more tweaks. Some scenarios are pretty much the same as before, but in general, changes to the dialog, characterizations, and plot details should make it different enough to seem fresh even to veterans.

This was my first encounter with WML so it's nothing spectacular on that front, I'm still learning. Some files are straight-up copied from HttT and it'd be more efficient if they were called from the core campaign. Some plot holes have been fixed but it's now more dialog-heavy; I tend to over-explain things. No balancing was done because I'm only one person and it's time-consuming; I was aiming for flavor more than gameplay. In general, I feel like I've made it harder overall. So there are flaws I'm aware of, but I think I improved the story and characterization. I'm particularly fond of how Li'sar turned out, but Konrad and Delfador also got some more depth.

Anyways, Heir to the Throne Revised is out on 1.12. server. If you don't mind a more story&character-oriented campaign, it might be your cup of tea. Most of the changes were made according to my personal tastes and might not be in line with what the developers intended for the fully polished HttT. Bigger changes start from 'The Princess of Wesnoth' scenario so the first part can be a bit same-y. Any feedback is welcome! :D

Konrad2
Forum Regular
Posts: 960
Joined: November 24th, 2010, 6:30 pm

Re: HttT Revised

Post by Konrad2 » June 17th, 2018, 10:46 am

I'd like to point out that most people do not use Wesnoth 1.12. anymore, as 1.14. has been the stable version for over a month now. So yeah. It's unlikely you will get a lot of feedback.
I am a Ghost: I drain the life energy from other people to survive and am hated/feared by regular people. Non-regular people don't like me either though.

BTIsaac
Posts: 244
Joined: December 7th, 2017, 7:30 am

Re: HttT Revised

Post by BTIsaac » June 17th, 2018, 2:56 pm

Actually, i still use 1.12
Not sure if 1.14 ever gets ported to android, and a lot of the umc isn't ported so...

User avatar
zookeeper
WML Wizard
Posts: 9726
Joined: September 11th, 2004, 10:40 pm
Location: Finland

Re: HttT Revised

Post by zookeeper » June 18th, 2018, 7:49 pm

I took a look at the changes, and the story/dialogue ideas seem pretty solid. There's a lot of details to polish (typos, some of the language in general, some exchanges could perhaps be condensed), but overall I think it does improve some of the characterizations a lot.

Some quick thoughts:

- Asheviere's impedes ability is a pretty huge tomato surprise, and probably hard to navigate because the movement range highlighting won't reflect it. A tomato spawn of 6 Royal Guards within attack distance (nor the nagas) don't exactly make it more gentle, either.

- I'd argue that the "Your king will [...]" references from DM don't fit: one plays HttT before DM (or should, anyway) and the line in DM is a reference to HttT, so this is basically HttT making a reference to something in DM that is a reference to HttT. It's not and wouldn't be explained in HttT and would appear inexplicably cryptic to anyone who hasn't played DM. It is a good idea and used neatly, but in this case I think it's too confusing and not self-contained enough.

- Eleanora is an interesting addition. Perhaps her first appearance could be split between Ford of Abez and Dwarven Doors? I'm also not entirely sure whose side she is on. Her first appearance made it seem to me like she secretly hopes that Li'sar would indeed defy the orders, then on her second appearance she seems to be genuinely working against the rebels, and on her final appearance she just doesn't seem to care much either way. I'm inclined to suggest that she'd be a character who's secretly rooting for Li'sar and/or the rebels and gently trying to nudge them along but always maintaining plausible deniability, only abandoning Asheviere at the last moment.

WanderingHero
Posts: 163
Joined: May 30th, 2011, 2:03 pm
Location: Uk, London

Re: HttT Revised

Post by WanderingHero » June 23rd, 2018, 9:34 am

I still use 1.12.5 so Im fine with this, though I should point out when i pick up the armour in scenario 2 I get a wml error and it disappears instead of whatever its supposed to do happening

Edit and on 1.12.6 Oh it adds 15hp to a unit but doesnt display a message

Caladbolg
Posts: 137
Joined: January 1st, 2016, 4:40 pm
Location: Hopelessly trapped within the Submachine

Re: HttT Revised

Post by Caladbolg » June 23rd, 2018, 4:04 pm

Sorry for the late replies!
Konrad2 wrote:I'd like to point out that most people do not use Wesnoth 1.12. anymore, as 1.14. has been the stable version for over a month now. So yeah. It's unlikely you will get a lot of feedback.
I'm aware, but I don't have time to port it to 1.14 atm.
zookeeper wrote:- Asheviere's impedes ability is a pretty huge tomato surprise, and probably hard to navigate because the movement range highlighting won't reflect it. A tomato spawn of 6 Royal Guards within attack distance (nor the nagas) don't exactly make it more gentle, either.
Yeah, I really went overboard on the last scenario :lol: About Asheviere's ability, it seemed nice as an idea, but my wml is not good enough to make it do exactly what I wanted. I was thinking about replacing it with something more moderate but I'm not sure what would fit. As she is more of a mage in this rendition, I'd like her to have something special. I always thought she was pretty disappointing as the final boss in HttT. Royal guards are also a bit much and the whole balance is off, I'll need to redo this scenario. However, I'd like to keep nagas or at least have something similar to discourage the gryphon assassination strategy. Maybe some fiddling with unit placement could achieve it, but having nagas there helps break up the whole 'naga are always against humans' stereotype. Especially considering the mermen would be against Asheviere and could use the river, having water units would be advantageous for her, and she already has orcish mercenaries.
zookeeper wrote:- I'd argue that the "Your king will [...]" references from DM don't fit: one plays HttT before DM (or should, anyway) and the line in DM is a reference to HttT, so this is basically HttT making a reference to something in DM that is a reference to HttT. It's not and wouldn't be explained in HttT and would appear inexplicably cryptic to anyone who hasn't played DM. It is a good idea and used neatly, but in this case I think it's too confusing and not self-contained enough.
I agree. The more I look at it, the more it seems it just clutters the dialog. I think the tie-in with DM you put in the Underground Channels was pretty neat so I'll keep it and tone down the other references to it.
zookeeper wrote:- Eleanora is an interesting addition. Perhaps her first appearance could be split between Ford of Abez and Dwarven Doors? I'm also not entirely sure whose side she is on. Her first appearance made it seem to me like she secretly hopes that Li'sar would indeed defy the orders, then on her second appearance she seems to be genuinely working against the rebels, and on her final appearance she just doesn't seem to care much either way. I'm inclined to suggest that she'd be a character who's secretly rooting for Li'sar and/or the rebels and gently trying to nudge them along but always maintaining plausible deniability, only abandoning Asheviere at the last moment.
I had a lot of fun writing her :D I think that developing Li'sar's characterization requires more exploration of her relations with Ashieviere, but they don't come into contact until the last scenario. So I made Eleanora as a sort of a middle-man in their relationship. Her motives remain mysterious on purpose (some room for a possible campaign with her as a protagonist :whistle: ), but suffice it to say that she is on neither side and has her own motives ;)
WanderingHero wrote:I still use 1.12.5 so Im fine with this, though I should point out when i pick up the armour in scenario 2 I get a wml error and it disappears instead of whatever its supposed to do happening
Edit and on 1.12.6 Oh it adds 15hp to a unit but doesnt display a message
Uh oh.. that's not supposed to be there...:oops: I was testing out how objects work and I forgot to erase that thing :doh: Thanks for bringing it up, I'll remove it when I do the next version.

Post Reply