Return from the Abyss [SP campaign for 1.12/1.14]
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hi skeptical_troll,
if it does help with your playtesting, here is a replay for Scenario 10 on hard. Had to try several times due to Gnargs suicidal tendencies and bad tactics on my side but in the end it was quite playable. Even though I had to sacrifice some veterans
I do like the campaign a lot, catchy story and challenging battles, sometimes at the limit of being annoyingly challenging (I HATE centipedes by now). I definitely like the little specials (lighthouses, campfires etc). And it's fun playing Khalifates...
Thanks for this campaign (and for Hunters of the east as well, nearly all said applys to that one too) !
if it does help with your playtesting, here is a replay for Scenario 10 on hard. Had to try several times due to Gnargs suicidal tendencies and bad tactics on my side but in the end it was quite playable. Even though I had to sacrifice some veterans
I do like the campaign a lot, catchy story and challenging battles, sometimes at the limit of being annoyingly challenging (I HATE centipedes by now). I definitely like the little specials (lighthouses, campfires etc). And it's fun playing Khalifates...
Thanks for this campaign (and for Hunters of the east as well, nearly all said applys to that one too) !
- Attachments
-
- RftA-At_war_replay.gz
- (73.91 KiB) Downloaded 389 times
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hi lesasch, I'm glad that you are liking the campaign and thanks for pioneering this scenario in advance on the release! Looking at your replay it seemed indeed too tense. Since that version I've made a few changes (which will be uploaded together with the rest of the second part), in particular I gave the player control of Gnarg (with a bit less gold) and moved the elvish leader closer to the river, so that the final hunt is less tedious. It should be easier now, although finish early and getting enough gold for the next one will be important.
You're not the first one having bad experiences with the centipedes, that level seems to be an early bottleneck. I may decide to decrease their number a bit, or make them weaker.
One question: is it clear that the shaman has the 'instigation' ability (helps in bad day times)? I'm afraid it is only vaguely hinted to in 'Path to Light', but I shall probably spell it out somewhere.
You're not the first one having bad experiences with the centipedes, that level seems to be an early bottleneck. I may decide to decrease their number a bit, or make them weaker.
One question: is it clear that the shaman has the 'instigation' ability (helps in bad day times)? I'm afraid it is only vaguely hinted to in 'Path to Light', but I shall probably spell it out somewhere.
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hi skeptical_troll,
I somehow had a good look on the shaman and spotted the instigation-ability, if it does not show in the replay - im actually not a good player, forgetting a lot about using the traits...
I do not know, if i would have realized by reading the dialogue. Actually I just had to read through the scenario-file to spot the
"Dark and light, good and evil, the stones on which the world is built they are. Fear them not. Stay close to me in the battle, help you I will." but I have to admit that when I started to play that Scenario the first time it was late nighttime and I was a bit sloppy about reading.....looking for it it was easy to spot, so actually it is quite clear and I think it's a nice feature of your campaigns that it pays off to read dialogues attentively. By now, everybody who did not spot it can read it here
I have to replay the "Path" anyway, I did not recruit a Spearman and had to leave the hero spear behind, can't stand that....
The centipede-level is a thing ... actually I do not think anybody will pass it in the first try as you have to be prepared for the bloody worms. Due to the hint, that one will not control dwarves for much longer i hardly recruited them because i didn't want to spoil XP... A save way to not manage the level, I only learned that by reading this thread
My only way too avoid getting rooted by the centipedes was to use a lot of dwarves and to be prepared to move to the Cave where the Shrine is (see attached Replay). But on the other hand, why not - no-pro-players playing on hard should expect hard times.....And I really liked exploring the cave, it has some nice details. Liked the Lighthouse-feature! Maybe I have to replay the campaign on easy, just to relish the feeling of crushing worms....
I somehow had a good look on the shaman and spotted the instigation-ability, if it does not show in the replay - im actually not a good player, forgetting a lot about using the traits...
I do not know, if i would have realized by reading the dialogue. Actually I just had to read through the scenario-file to spot the
"Dark and light, good and evil, the stones on which the world is built they are. Fear them not. Stay close to me in the battle, help you I will." but I have to admit that when I started to play that Scenario the first time it was late nighttime and I was a bit sloppy about reading.....looking for it it was easy to spot, so actually it is quite clear and I think it's a nice feature of your campaigns that it pays off to read dialogues attentively. By now, everybody who did not spot it can read it here
I have to replay the "Path" anyway, I did not recruit a Spearman and had to leave the hero spear behind, can't stand that....
The centipede-level is a thing ... actually I do not think anybody will pass it in the first try as you have to be prepared for the bloody worms. Due to the hint, that one will not control dwarves for much longer i hardly recruited them because i didn't want to spoil XP... A save way to not manage the level, I only learned that by reading this thread
My only way too avoid getting rooted by the centipedes was to use a lot of dwarves and to be prepared to move to the Cave where the Shrine is (see attached Replay). But on the other hand, why not - no-pro-players playing on hard should expect hard times.....And I really liked exploring the cave, it has some nice details. Liked the Lighthouse-feature! Maybe I have to replay the campaign on easy, just to relish the feeling of crushing worms....
- Attachments
-
- RftA-The_Old_Castle_replay.gz
- (75.03 KiB) Downloaded 372 times
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
There we go: second part is now out!
Contrary to the first part, here you'll have a lot of sun, fresh air, wide distances, wind blowing on your face etc etc.. There are seven more scenarios in this part (and 2.5 cut scenes), but two of them are alternative in a fork. Similar to the first part, in some scenarios you will have to combine your khalifate units with other factions. Game mechanic might be a bit unusual from time to time, I personally tested and roughly balanced the scenarios a few times but your feedback is really welcome, as always.
If you had a version of the campaign with the dummy epilogue you can load from there, otherwise you should either start from 'path to light' or use :cl in debug mode to select the right level (search for 'with_the_orcs') and then adjust your gold.
@lesasch: thanks for the replay, that's a really creative way of passing the level! I never even thought of that I agree that many people will have to restart that scenario, luckily it's not a very long one (at least for my standards!). I may eventually remove that note on the dwarves.
Contrary to the first part, here you'll have a lot of sun, fresh air, wide distances, wind blowing on your face etc etc.. There are seven more scenarios in this part (and 2.5 cut scenes), but two of them are alternative in a fork. Similar to the first part, in some scenarios you will have to combine your khalifate units with other factions. Game mechanic might be a bit unusual from time to time, I personally tested and roughly balanced the scenarios a few times but your feedback is really welcome, as always.
If you had a version of the campaign with the dummy epilogue you can load from there, otherwise you should either start from 'path to light' or use :cl in debug mode to select the right level (search for 'with_the_orcs') and then adjust your gold.
@lesasch: thanks for the replay, that's a really creative way of passing the level! I never even thought of that I agree that many people will have to restart that scenario, luckily it's not a very long one (at least for my standards!). I may eventually remove that note on the dwarves.
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Thank you for the update...
I finished Path to Light from an old mid-scenario save yesterday (earlier i had a lot of trouble with the naga, but this time i did not linger long and it worked fine) and looked around the next scenario a little. Today without any update in between I could start none of the campaign saves start of scenario, mid-scenario, none whatsoever (due to unknown unit type rfta old orc shaman). When I un- and reinstalled the campaign the saves work again, but even now the game crashes consistently when loading scenario save while I am in the replay of Path to Light.
Path to Light hands you a bunch of loyals toward the end, I did not bother hanging around to level them, but nothing really would have prevented it, which makes it possible to play quite gamey towards the end of Path to Light and start with 5 xp optimised loyal orcs in the next one. I don't think it matters much, the next scenario does not look that hard.
I finished Path to Light from an old mid-scenario save yesterday (earlier i had a lot of trouble with the naga, but this time i did not linger long and it worked fine) and looked around the next scenario a little. Today without any update in between I could start none of the campaign saves start of scenario, mid-scenario, none whatsoever (due to unknown unit type rfta old orc shaman). When I un- and reinstalled the campaign the saves work again, but even now the game crashes consistently when loading scenario save while I am in the replay of Path to Light.
Path to Light hands you a bunch of loyals toward the end, I did not bother hanging around to level them, but nothing really would have prevented it, which makes it possible to play quite gamey towards the end of Path to Light and start with 5 xp optimised loyal orcs in the next one. I don't think it matters much, the next scenario does not look that hard.
- Attachments
-
- RftA-Path_to_Light_replay.gz
- (147.44 KiB) Downloaded 382 times
I am a Saurian Skirmisher: I'm a real pest, especially at night.
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Thanks for the replay. My impression is that it is definitely too long (and probably repetitive) now. Maybe decreasing the enemies a bit will do, it will be slightly easier and smoother, but will also reduce the xp-farming. I thought that in the final part the Nagas horde was sufficient to motivate the player to escape quickly. I don't think you can rotate indefinitely because you don't have healing and the enemies will just keep coming, so you may lose precious units. In your case you had quite an impressive army though, thanks to all the experience you gained.
I am not sure what is causing the bug, now that you re-installed the campaign is the problem limited to loading old saves from replays? It could be connected to the fact that I fixed the #textdomain of some units' .cfg file.
I am not sure what is causing the bug, now that you re-installed the campaign is the problem limited to loading old saves from replays? It could be connected to the fact that I fixed the #textdomain of some units' .cfg file.
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
It's really great to see that part II is here!! I've played the first 3 scenarios so far (campaign version 0.1.0). (I didn't have any issues loading my "At War" scenario start save from the older version.)
The Orcs Strike Back:
This was an epic scenario- it really had the feel of storming a fortress and was an intense battle from start to finish!
The objectives ("Defeat the enemy leaders") seem to imply that you have to defeat all leaders, but you only have to kill the two in the fortress. Also the gold carryover (40%) wasn't stated in the objectives.
This doesn't actually affect anything, but after this scenario when you view the full recall list (by using the recall hotkey without selecting a hex first) you can still see the orc units in the list.
Iron and mud:
I really loved this scenario's map, with all the extra areas to explore. Very creative design!
Objectives: Maybe specify "Khalifate explorers" just to make it 100% clear. I think that defeating all the leaders is actually faster than moving 6 explorers back to the starting camp, in addition to giving experience and the early finish gold. It also allows you to use the explorers in the battle and even get them killed (maybe it should be required that at least 6 survive?).
I didn't find all the free saurian reinforcements necessary (I was already winning the battle without them) but they were a nice flavor event.
Maybe instead of having tunnels to the dungeon entrances, a unit could get automatically transported to the dungeon when stepping on the trapdoor and vice versa. It's not a big deal, but the tunnel requires you to manually scroll the map all the way to the destination hex every time.
The Orcs Strike Back:
This was an epic scenario- it really had the feel of storming a fortress and was an intense battle from start to finish!
The objectives ("Defeat the enemy leaders") seem to imply that you have to defeat all leaders, but you only have to kill the two in the fortress. Also the gold carryover (40%) wasn't stated in the objectives.
This doesn't actually affect anything, but after this scenario when you view the full recall list (by using the recall hotkey without selecting a hex first) you can still see the orc units in the list.
Iron and mud:
I really loved this scenario's map, with all the extra areas to explore. Very creative design!
Objectives: Maybe specify "Khalifate explorers" just to make it 100% clear. I think that defeating all the leaders is actually faster than moving 6 explorers back to the starting camp, in addition to giving experience and the early finish gold. It also allows you to use the explorers in the battle and even get them killed (maybe it should be required that at least 6 survive?).
I didn't find all the free saurian reinforcements necessary (I was already winning the battle without them) but they were a nice flavor event.
Maybe instead of having tunnels to the dungeon entrances, a unit could get automatically transported to the dungeon when stepping on the trapdoor and vice versa. It's not a big deal, but the tunnel requires you to manually scroll the map all the way to the destination hex every time.
Replay summaries
Typos
- Attachments
-
- RftA-Iron_and_mud_replay.gz
- 8th scenario
- (101.08 KiB) Downloaded 351 times
-
- RftA-The_Orcs_Strike_Back_replay.gz
- 7th scenario
- (89.32 KiB) Downloaded 388 times
-
- RftA-At_war_replay.gz
- 6th scenario
- (73.15 KiB) Downloaded 360 times
Screenshot playthroughs: Let's Play Dead Water, Let's Play Invasion from the Unknown and Let's Play After the Storm
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hi Inky, thanks for your comments and for the corrections, as always!
Iron and mud:
I also agree that in this scenario, as things stand, finishing off the enemies is easier than retreating with the rescued explorers (I now request them to stay alive even in the former case, as you suggested). I was considering adding enemies reinforcements towards the end from the south-east (they are even mentioned in the initial dialog), which would also make the final fight more interesting.
I'm glad that you liked it, took a while to set up. In the ideal balance, I would like to reward the player that sends forces to cut out the naval supply, but on 'hard' this seems not doable at the moment. Maybe I could place the ford further north in the map, a bit out of the main action. I fixed the objectives and removed the orcs from the recall list, thanks for noting.Inky wrote:The Orcs Strike Back:
This was an epic scenario- it really had the feel of storming a fortress and was an intense battle from start to finish!
The objectives ("Defeat the enemy leaders") seem to imply that you have to defeat all leaders, but you only have to kill the two in the fortress. Also the gold carryover (40%) wasn't stated in the objectives.
This doesn't actually affect anything, but after this scenario when you view the full recall list (by using the recall hotkey without selecting a hex first) you can still see the orc units in the list.
Iron and mud:
I've thought about that, but teleporting automatically the units would make it tricky if the player wants to keep them at the entrance for whatever reason (maybe there is a fight going on there) and it might also break the ZOC of a possible enemy adjacent to the trapdoor. I am not sure if there are ways of going around that, maybe an option dialog which ask confirmation to the player and triggers only if there is no ZOC? It might be equally annoying as scrolling the map though.Inky wrote:Maybe instead of having tunnels to the dungeon entrances, a unit could get automatically transported to the dungeon when stepping on the trapdoor and vice versa. It's not a big deal, but the tunnel requires you to manually scroll the map all the way to the destination hex every time.
I also agree that in this scenario, as things stand, finishing off the enemies is easier than retreating with the rescued explorers (I now request them to stay alive even in the former case, as you suggested). I was considering adding enemies reinforcements towards the end from the south-east (they are even mentioned in the initial dialog), which would also make the final fight more interesting.
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
At War: The reduced carryover is to mitigate the dual carryover game logic fault, I assume. Great to see someone recognise it. (Guess it is a decent fix until there is a better solution. Say a dialog/slider deciding how early finish bonus is distributed among allies?) This is harder than I initially thought, I tried going east in force in an earlier attempt, but that did not work out. I did fairly well around the keep, but the center hill area nearly turned into a disaster (went with insufficient forces and had to extricate loyals), forgot to move the batal earmarked for the area there. The rest is rather sloppily played and I got lucky here and there (after decidedly bad luck initially). I am oddly constrained in using non-loyal high level units for upkeep reasons and without healing veterans do considerably less work than you would hope for. Yet, the L1 northerners I recruited with Gnarg lacked damage output so bad... Did not get the elves to attack me out of order as I wanted, a lot of good grouping going on. (I realised most of my Khalifate veterans have 6 movement. I have mostly slow jundi type units and fast units of the other types in the recall list incl. different traits on loyals compared to Inky.)
- Attachments
-
- RftA-At_war_replay.gz
- (90.63 KiB) Downloaded 386 times
I am a Saurian Skirmisher: I'm a real pest, especially at night.
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
I started playing this campaign and i must say that it´s quite good! The mechanic of having limited recruits is interesting and, although it doesn´t make a difference now, it will probably do in the end of it (i´m currently at 78 available recruits).
Looking forward to end this one
Spoiler:
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Indeed, I remembered you pointing this out regarding some scenario of Hunters of the East, so I chose this way to reduce the bonus and make it consistent with the standard 40%. It still makes early ending much preferable than banking, but the difference is not so drastic and the bonus comes in a reasonable amount.taptap wrote:The reduced carryover is to mitigate the dual carryover game logic fault, I assume.
I noticed that in your replay the villages in the central valley (which are clearly very important) were better defended by the AI compared to Inky's case. That, I think, made things more difficult for you but I'm not sure on what this difference is due to.
Thanks! Since the campaign is only 66% complete, the number of recruits is impossible to balance for the moment (if not veeery tentatively), so it is more a flavor thing to give the feel of a close group of comrades. In the future I might make numbers more tight, but during the whole campaign the players got plenty of allied sides to complement the Khalifate troops, so hopefully nobody will get stuck due to this.ahmannar wrote:I started playing this campaign and i must say that it´s quite good! The mechanic of having limited recruits is interesting and, although it doesn´t make a difference now, it will probably do in the end of it
Spoiler:
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hmm maybe the automatic teleporting could only happen if your unit has at least 1 movement point left? That way a unit won't get teleported if an enemy is adjacent to the trapdoor (because moving adjacent to an enemy unit makes it lose all its movement). I guess doing it this way might be unclear to the player though.skeptical_troll wrote: Iron and mud:I've thought about that, but teleporting automatically the units would make it tricky if the player wants to keep them at the entrance for whatever reason (maybe there is a fight going on there) and it might also break the ZOC of a possible enemy adjacent to the trapdoor. I am not sure if there are ways of going around that, maybe an option dialog which ask confirmation to the player and triggers only if there is no ZOC? It might be equally annoying as scrolling the map though.Inky wrote:Maybe instead of having tunnels to the dungeon entrances, a unit could get automatically transported to the dungeon when stepping on the trapdoor and vice versa. It's not a big deal, but the tunnel requires you to manually scroll the map all the way to the destination hex every time.
----------------------------------------------
Finished the rest of Part 2! (campaign version 0.1.1)
Occult Ridge / Misty Valley
I played both branches and they seemed very balanced in terms of gold and XP available, and difficulty. I especially liked the mechanic in Misty Valley of the tide coming in and out - very cool!
The Plague
-The peasant leader starts with 44/23 HP. I assume this was intentional to make him live longer but it looks strange; maybe make him a higher level unit instead?
-The scenario seems too easy because you can just bypass the village using the swampy crossing to the right. I never had to fight the western bandits, only the southern ones. Maybe modify the map so Khafir's units are forced to go through the village?
Forest of Crossing Paths
-Maybe allow Rynwarth's units to also trigger the dialogue with the goblins?
-The bandit leader seems too weak at the beginning, because right now you can just quickly swarm him with powerful veterans. I used the 2-hex northwestern keep (I think using the fort could work too) to recall several Khalids etc. and killed the leader on turn 12/57. Probably the main cause of this is that the previous scenario was too easy so you could get quite a bit of carryover (I started Forest of Crossing Paths with 160 = 80 + 80 carryover gold).
p.s. I always like reading the two dwarves' dialogue at the end of each scenario
Replay summaries
Typos
- Attachments
-
- RftA-The_Forest_of_the_Cros..._replay.gz
- 11th scenario (16)
- (85.02 KiB) Downloaded 366 times
-
- RftA-The_Plague_replay.gz
- 10th scenario (15)
- (64.82 KiB) Downloaded 360 times
-
- RftA-Misty_Valley_replay.gz
- 9th scenario, other branch (14a)
- (67.59 KiB) Downloaded 354 times
-
- RftA-The_Occult_Ridge_replay.gz
- 9th scenario (14b)
- (59.38 KiB) Downloaded 391 times
Screenshot playthroughs: Let's Play Dead Water, Let's Play Invasion from the Unknown and Let's Play After the Storm
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Now I changed the max_hitpoints so that it is 44/44, but I agree it's still a bit strange. On the other hand it makes sense for him to be a peasant, for story reason. Alternatively I can pretend he has an armor and give him some resistance.Inky wrote:-The peasant leader starts with 44/23 HP. I assume this was intentional to make him live longer but it looks strange; maybe make him a higher level unit instead?
So, this is meant to be a very easy one, although in my original idea I was thinking of an engagement with the western forces together with the peasants (with the risk of infection). Changing the maps is probably the way to go.Inky wrote:-The scenario seems too easy because you can just bypass the village using the swampy crossing to the right. I never had to fight the western bandits, only the southern ones. Maybe modify the map so Khafir's units are forced to go through the village?
Indeed, I overlooked that. It has been fixed nowInky wrote: -Maybe allow Rynwarth's units to also trigger the dialogue with the goblins?
I knew you would have done that!Inky wrote:-The bandit leader seems too weak at the beginning, because right now you can just quickly swarm him with powerful veterans. I used the 2-hex northwestern keep (I think using the fort could work too) to recall several Khalids etc. and killed the leader on turn 12/57. Probably the main cause of this is that the previous scenario was too easy so you could get quite a bit of carryover (I started Forest of Crossing Paths with 160 = 80 + 80 carryover gold).
Carryover is certainly part of the problem, so once I fixed the previous scenario maybe this won't happen anymore. Alternatively I can just leave one hex to recruit in the northwestern keep, so that it won't be possible to have enough firepower for the blitzkrieg strategy, and give the bandits more starting gold so that by the time Khafir reaches the fortress they will have piled up enough units. I will probably change a few things in these last two scenarios anyway.
Thanks for testing this part and for the corrections!
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Hi, skeptical_troll!
The campaign is great. Gameplay is fun, story is amazing and it makes me feel like I am personally participating in the events
I am on scenario 4 "The Old Castle" and found one minor bug.
The campaign is great. Gameplay is fun, story is amazing and it makes me feel like I am personally participating in the events
I am on scenario 4 "The Old Castle" and found one minor bug.
Spoiler:
Author of SP scenario Dragon Fight and SP campaign Captured by a Nightmare.
Created The Rise of Wesnoth (alternative mechanics) version of the mainline campaign.
Created The Rise of Wesnoth (alternative mechanics) version of the mainline campaign.
- skeptical_troll
- Posts: 500
- Joined: August 31st, 2015, 11:06 pm
Re: Return from the Abyss [WIP campaign for 1.12]
Thanks a lot! Well spotted, I fixed it, will be updated in the next release.