THoT Forbidden Forest objective
Moderator: Forum Moderators
THoT Forbidden Forest objective
The objective of the THoT scenario "Forbidden Forest" is
Perhaps the objective could be clarified?
I find that unclear since while there is a signpost on the map, the signpost occupies a hex and two units can't occupy the same hex at once. I had to check the WML to figure out what the victory condition is: the scenario is won as soon as Aiglondur reaches the signpost hex after Angarthing already visited that hex, or vice versa. If I hadn't read the WML I would have assumed that Aiglondur needed to be on the hex and Angarthing next to him, or something like that.Move both Aiglondur and Angarthing to the eastern signpost
Perhaps the objective could be clarified?
- stefankeys
- Posts: 6
- Joined: March 12th, 2019, 8:07 pm
- Location: London, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: THoT Forbidden Forest objective
Yes that sounds confusing but it sounds a bit hard to clarify the explanation without it being a word or two too long....
Check out my blog at sosbrigade.club
Re: THoT Forbidden Forest objective
We could add a "note", shown at the bottom of the objectives dialog in white, if that helps. The condition that triggers victory has changed since I started this thread: now it's "Aiglondur needs to be on the signpost and Angarthing next to him, or vice-versa".
Re: THoT Forbidden Forest objective
Yes that makes more sense than before and is likely what I would do given the instruction you previously described.josteph wrote: ↑March 13th, 2019, 10:08 pm We could add a "note", shown at the bottom of the objectives dialog in white, if that helps. The condition that triggers victory has changed since I started this thread: now it's "Aiglondur needs to be on the signpost and Angarthing next to him, or vice-versa".
Also a note probably would be helpful so it makes sense to add it to clarify.
Creator of: The Reign of The Lords Era,The Gnats Franken Dungeon.
Re: THoT Forbidden Forest objective
Okay, clarified in 7c839e45a96279007e7e7282e42454479644e390. I can't backport it right now because of string freeze but I'll make a note to backport it for 1.14.8. Until then if anyone has tweaks to the wording, please suggest them. Thanks for the feedback!