dwarf in need of serious critique: totally serious

Post by **Thrawn** » September 5th, 2006, 11:39 pm

it was supposed to be a thunderer, but somehw it doesn't look right.

Post by **Kestenvarn** » September 5th, 2006, 11:46 pm

It's the balloon.

Post by **Thrawn** » September 5th, 2006, 11:48 pm

Kestenvarn wrote:It's the balloon.

not 3-D enough?

Dragon Master · Post by **Dragon Master** » September 6th, 2006, 12:08 am

......
..................
...........................You can't be totally serious, if you would, he wouldn't have a santa hat, baloon, and voodoo doll. Is that a snake on his shoulder? and the floating woman torso doesn't help much either. You cannot, absolutely CANNOT take an artistic liscense on this. If you really want this to be a serious portrait, please explain why it so totally out of whack. Oh, and the horns are not necessary.

Post by **Kestenvarn** » September 6th, 2006, 12:22 am

Dragon Master wrote:You can't be totally serious, if you would, he wouldn't have a santa hat, baloon, and voodoo doll. Is that a snake on his shoulder? and the floating woman torso doesn't help much either. You cannot, absolutely CANNOT take an artistic liscense on this. If you really want this to be a serious portrait, please explain why it so totally out of whack. Oh, and the horns are not necessary.

Is this a lack of humor or translation difficulties? Can never be sure on this forum.

PS. This is obviously a sketch taken from a page that had more than one portrait on it. "Floating woman torso", my ass.

Cuyo Quiz · Post by **Cuyo Quiz** » September 6th, 2006, 1:39 am

It isn's floating, it is behind the Dwarf among mist. It shows height difference for added realism.

Pfft, bunch of ignorants.

Post by **Jetrel** » September 6th, 2006, 2:44 am

Dragon Master wrote:
......
..................
...........................You can't be totally serious, if you would, he wouldn't have a santa hat, baloon, and voodoo doll. Is that a snake on his shoulder? and the floating woman torso doesn't help much either. You cannot, absolutely CANNOT take an artistic liscense on this. If you really want this to be a serious portrait, please explain why it so totally out of whack. Oh, and the horns are not necessary.

SNAKES ON A DWARF, FOOL.

(To state the what should be obvious, after making several serious drawings, Thrawn posted this one for comic relief.)

JW · Post by JW » September 6th, 2006, 5:18 am

Where's his jetpack?

halleck · Post by **halleck** » September 6th, 2006, 11:39 am

If he is holding a balloon that clearly states he is happy than why is he burning a midget goblin in his hands?

halleck wrote:If he is holding a balloon that clearly states he is happy than why is he burning a midget goblin in his hands?

EDIT: Oh wait... That is why he is happy...

Oreb · Post by **Oreb** » September 6th, 2006, 11:55 am

halleck wrote:If he is holding a balloon that clearly states he is happy than why is he burning a midget goblin in his hands?

EDIT: Oh wait... That is why he is happy...

Wouldn't you be happy with a flaming midget goblin in your hands. And the girl in the mist is obviously his girlfriend, the snake is his new pet. so he must be happy, for he has all these things we wish we could have

Post by **Kestenvarn** » September 6th, 2006, 12:33 pm

Oreb wrote:And the girl in the mist is obviously his girlfriend, the snake is his new pet. so he must be happy, for he has all these things we wish we could have

Yeah, but I heard the girl is a klepto. Not so happy ending??

Cuyo Quiz · Post by **Cuyo Quiz** » September 6th, 2006, 1:43 pm

Everyone here likes a little mental problems with their plot relationships, i bet. It comes with the hot and perky package as insurance, most of the time.

Flamng midget goblin shuld be slang for something...

rooster600500 · Post by **rooster600500** » September 21st, 2006, 6:10 pm

a very good waste of time couldnt off done better myself (and im very good at wasting time i can make a teacher talk for the whole lesson!)

Jester · Post by **Jester** » September 21st, 2006, 7:01 pm

rooster600500 wrote:a very good waste of time couldnt off done better myself (and im very good at wasting time i can make a teacher talk for the whole lesson!)

A very good waste of a post... Rooster you seriously need to stop making all these useless resurrecting posts. A dead thread is only to be reawakened if you can add something good to the discussion, something that hasn't been discussed before.

Hoppe-man · Post by **Hoppe-man** » September 26th, 2006, 12:31 am

Kestenvarn wrote:It's the balloon.

I have to agree!

Take care and God bless,
Hoppe-man