turin wrote: I definitely see Jetryl's point. The two bows are much more obviously the same attack type in the non-flipped version. And I don't think the flipping helped a lot with the directionality; IMHO, it makes the bows look awkward, and does't much of a difference with the others.
I'm going to have to switch my vote to, don't flip them.
I agree. To get the 'flip' to work all weapons need to have the same tilt in the same direction in the base version. As we see in this the sword and bow tilt to opposite sides to begin with and then when it's flipped the bow seems all wrong even though it's the right way. Not to mention that it looks totally random since now both sides flip both ways.
I don't need a mock-up to cast my vote as no, but hell that does look awkward.
I hope no one proposes to place the units in the side they are attacking too.
Cuyo Quiz,where madness meets me
Turn on, tune in, fall out.
"I know that, but every single person nags about how negative turin is; it should be in the FPI thread "Turin should give positive comments" =)"-Neorice,23 Sep 2004
It's just like the manga writers who protest when people want to flip their work so that american's can more easily read it...it makes the art look funny.
After seeing that, I conclude that *both* ways are awkward. Do as you will.
It's all fun and games until someone loses a lawsuit. Oh, and by the way, sending me private messages won't work. :/ If you must contact me, there's an e-mail address listed on the website in my profile.
I definitely see Jetryl's point. The two bows are much more obviously the same attack type in the non-flipped version. And I don't think the flipping helped a lot with the directionality; IMHO, it makes the bows look awkward, and does't much of a difference with the others.
