New Ability: Slayer

Elvish_Pillager · Post by **Elvish_Pillager** » January 29th, 2006, 11:30 pm

Not you two again...

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 29th, 2006, 11:33 pm

im not doing it on purpose but hes being fake by saying that im wrong when hes doing the some thing that i am

Cuyo Quiz · Post by **Cuyo Quiz** » January 29th, 2006, 11:47 pm

Let the kitten-hurling COMMENCE.

Pressure/Opportunist are were i cast my vote.

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 29th, 2006, 11:49 pm

you have an awesome avatar.

KILL THE BIRD!!!!

Assasin · Post by **Assasin** » January 29th, 2006, 11:59 pm

Belwar wrote:im not doing it on purpose but hes being fake by saying that im wrong when hes doing the some thing that i am

no, I'm not.

You're being imature and unfunny

Post by **Maeglin Dubh** » January 30th, 2006, 12:01 am

I have a wonderful idea. Everyone stop making [censored] personal comments in the Ideas forum. Go make a flamewar in OT. Have fun. This guy has a valid idea and he deserves better than two monkeys throwing crap and banana peels at each other.

Although, I hate to say, I think Assassin is in the right here...

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 30th, 2006, 12:10 am

i was just bored so yes i was being immature and i apoligize.

catwhowalksbyhimself · January 30th, 2006, 2:00 am

Making an idea short without adequately explaining it is bad. The explanation is not really that long, and is very easy to understand as it is complete with examples and answers to possible criticism. Very well argued I thought. Of course, if you just like to tear apart people's suggestions because they are short and confusing, than that's your problem.

As it is, this is a simple yet interesting possible new ability, whatever you call it and whichever version you want to sue. I like it!

Website · Post by **Sapient** » January 30th, 2006, 2:34 am

More name ideas:

accumulate, rally, galvanize, psych up, build up

My vote goes for "psych up"

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 30th, 2006, 3:43 am

i finnaly took the time to read the idea and it is a good idea except for the fact that it would be pretty difficult to code, but if someone would code it i would definately back it up for admission. however i think that i would be better for units that have fewer attacks rather than a unit that has more attacks, because it would be unbalanced.

Website · Post by **Sapient** » January 30th, 2006, 3:55 am

Belwar wrote:i finnaly took the time to read the idea and it is a good idea except for the fact that it would be pretty difficult to code,

Last time I checked, incrementing a number by one is a fairly simple procedure. Then again, maybe my math is a little rusty.

Belwar wrote: however i think that i would be better for units that have fewer attacks rather than a unit that has more attacks, because it would be unbalanced.

Oh noes! Someone might get an extra three or four points of damage!

This ability would only be interesting for units with a large number of attacks. And it hardly seems overpowered, even then.

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 30th, 2006, 4:16 am

ill support it just get someone to code it and you also need to have to get a developer to think that it is a good idea, once you get it coded you can move it up to development thats all im saying,l just get it done so that we can add more to make this game more interesting.

oh and its a little more complicated to code than u think

Website · Post by **Sapient** » January 30th, 2006, 4:24 am

If this ability would be hard to code then the code is in serious need of refactoring.

Belwar · Post by **Belwar** » January 30th, 2006, 4:35 am

then start a thread in the development section about how the code needs to be revamped

Website · Post by **Xan** » January 30th, 2006, 2:12 pm

Sapient wrote:If this ability would be hard to code then the code is in serious need of refactoring.

You could submit a patch...