[mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
That's not entirely correct. Only some units are liminal, the rest are lawful.Can-ned_Food wrote:Moreover, they fight best during the liminal conditions at either dawn or dusk, corresponding to the time when desert temperatures are the most tolerable."
Btw: how is this difference in alignment explained? It's understandable that saurians and drake have different alignments in the same faction, and same can be said about other examples in other factions... But why some of these humans fight better in twilight rather than day? Maybe the liminal alignment reflects an unruly nomadic lifestyle while lawful units are from major settlements? (this hypothesis is partially supported by the chaotic alignment of outlaws)
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Yeah that's basically the explanation. Lawful units from the cities and more civilised, liminal units in desert. It doesn't work to a 100% imo. Hakim for example could be a lawful unit too, so maybe it's also because of balancing.Xalzar wrote: Btw: how is this difference in alignment explained?...
Maybe the liminal alignment reflects an unruly nomadic lifestyle while lawful units are from major settlements? (this hypothesis is partially supported by the chaotic alignment of outlaws)
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
The Southern Legions has been in my head for a while. Dune Walkers has a bit of mystery to it if people insist on Dune as a prefix. Legions of Twilight.
"Those Who Shall Not Be Named" is probably the best
"Those Who Shall Not Be Named" is probably the best
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
This is another elegant wesnoth precedent broken by keeping the dunefolk so overly human. The faction's many-alignment-ness is much better illustrated by making it multi-racial, with each race having one particular alignment.Xalzar wrote:Only some units are liminal, the rest are lawful.
Btw: how is this difference in alignment explained? It's understandable that saurians and drake have different alignments in the same faction, and same can be said about other examples in other factions... But why some of these humans fight better in twilight rather than day?
- Pentarctagon
- Project Manager
- Posts: 5564
- Joined: March 22nd, 2009, 10:50 pm
- Location: Earth (occasionally)
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
In the sorts of deserts the Khalifate are from, my understanding is that the days are really hot and the nights are really cold. So from that, it could just be that those are the times and conditions they're most used to.Xalzar wrote:That's not entirely correct. Only some units are liminal, the rest are lawful.Can-ned_Food wrote:Moreover, they fight best during the liminal conditions at either dawn or dusk, corresponding to the time when desert temperatures are the most tolerable."
Btw: how is this difference in alignment explained? It's understandable that saurians and drake have different alignments in the same faction, and same can be said about other examples in other factions... But why some of these humans fight better in twilight rather than day? Maybe the liminal alignment reflects an unruly nomadic lifestyle while lawful units are from major settlements? (this hypothesis is partially supported by the chaotic alignment of outlaws)
99 little bugs in the code, 99 little bugs
take one down, patch it around
-2,147,483,648 little bugs in the code
take one down, patch it around
-2,147,483,648 little bugs in the code
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
All of this being sorted and into 1.14 is my focus for driving this discussion forward. It does not have to be 100% perfect, but I would like to see the faction, race and unit names solidified. The balance component would not be so readily addressed.SigurdFireDragon wrote:I think there’s some slight drift off topic starting to occur.
Let’s keep this simple.
I would like to see this done in time for 1.14
To all of the comments about units, I like the unit names as they are now, but also understand the value of simplicity and consistency so am open to whatever works best.
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
- Temuchin Khan
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: September 3rd, 2004, 6:35 pm
- Location: Player 6 on the original Agaia map
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
In the past, I've always argued for keeping the Khalifate's name as it is. I could, however, get to like the name "Dunefolk."
Check out my new book!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1956715029/re ... oks&sr=1-1
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1956715029/re ... oks&sr=1-1
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Yeah, but as someone pointed out, Caliph is an actual religious title in Islam, and not a general term. It would be like the Mage of Light upgrading to a Pope or something. A bit out of place for a fantasy setting.
Hm. Come to think of it, Mal Hekuba's unit type is 'Chaos Cardinal'. Weird.
Hm. Come to think of it, Mal Hekuba's unit type is 'Chaos Cardinal'. Weird.
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
This isn't the current issue being discussed, but I changed my suggestions for the-
What do you guys think about these unit names? We can discuss this while waiting for the poll to be parsed by the heads.
Naffat Line
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
I like them.mintleaf wrote:What do you guys think about these unit names? We can discuss this while waiting for the poll to be parsed by the heads.
- beetlenaut
- Developer
- Posts: 2825
- Joined: December 8th, 2007, 3:21 am
- Location: Washington State
- Contact:
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Those are the best suggestions I've seen for that line, but it should be "inferno"--the noun instead of the adjective (like all other unit names).
Campaigns: Dead Water,
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
The Founding of Borstep,
Secrets of the Ancients,
and WML Guide
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: February 7th, 2015, 1:27 am
- Location: Germany
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
I think those work well.
For the sake of discussion, I'd like to throw another option into the mix: Some people argued that they like the current unit names and don't think it's too much of a hurdle. I'm not one of those and it took me a whole campaign to get somewhat used to what name represents which unit and I still have no idea what most of them mean (I'd have to look it up every time).
I'd think though, if only one unit line had names like these, the confusion wouldn't occur, because it would be pretty obvious to which line the strange names belonged and sprites are clear indicators of level. And as the Naffat-line is certainly the most fantastical (even if it's a scientific marvel and not a magical) and the least paralleled to armed forces in our-world history, I, therefore, think it would also be an option to leave the names of this line be, while changing the rest!
For the sake of discussion, I'd like to throw another option into the mix: Some people argued that they like the current unit names and don't think it's too much of a hurdle. I'm not one of those and it took me a whole campaign to get somewhat used to what name represents which unit and I still have no idea what most of them mean (I'd have to look it up every time).
I'd think though, if only one unit line had names like these, the confusion wouldn't occur, because it would be pretty obvious to which line the strange names belonged and sprites are clear indicators of level. And as the Naffat-line is certainly the most fantastical (even if it's a scientific marvel and not a magical) and the least paralleled to armed forces in our-world history, I, therefore, think it would also be an option to leave the names of this line be, while changing the rest!
Under blood-red skies, an old man sits
In the ruins of Carthage - contemplating prophecy.
In the ruins of Carthage - contemplating prophecy.
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Long story short, the somewhat conservative player base populating this poll can live with Arab inspired nomads, dune-dwellers etc., but absolutely hates the idea of vaguely Arab inspired town-based states. Zombie hordes, dragons, alien invasions, human-alien hybrids... no problem, but don't give us civilised Southrons.
In my opinion, polls should have no place whatsoever in determining the outlook of factions etc. but it should be largely left to the people designing factions and writing campaigns for it. Don't imagine a faction according to your sensitivities, but look what fits such a great campain as Return from the Abyss (completely written under the premise of a centralised state able to send out military expeditions).
I really wish Wesnoth community at large were more courageous and less committed to derivative fantasy.
In my opinion, polls should have no place whatsoever in determining the outlook of factions etc. but it should be largely left to the people designing factions and writing campaigns for it. Don't imagine a faction according to your sensitivities, but look what fits such a great campain as Return from the Abyss (completely written under the premise of a centralised state able to send out military expeditions).
I really wish Wesnoth community at large were more courageous and less committed to derivative fantasy.
I am a Saurian Skirmisher: I'm a real pest, especially at night.
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
'Ho boy. That took longer than I expected but here it comes.taptap wrote:but don't give us civilised Southrons.
-
- Posts: 476
- Joined: February 7th, 2015, 1:27 am
- Location: Germany
Re: [mainline] Renaming Khalifate for Wesnoth-ian identity
Uhm, no idea what got you so riled up? The two by far most popular options Dunefolk and Southerners are completely free of any implications about the culture, infrastructure and rulign format of the faction!?
Also, to remind you of this gem:
Even the idea of Nomads (see spoiler above) you criticize, which isn't even far up in the poll, can be taken more creatively than a bland version of "vaguely Arab inspired town-based states". And the actual identity of the faction isn't even up for voting or in an advanced state of discussion.
As the faction is AFAIK unmaintained, I don't know who else should do this but the community!? Your argument about existing campaigns is a fair one (haven't played RftA, is it about Khalifate?), I raised similar concerns in relation to Oath of Allegiance, which is why I argued for options like Dunefolk, which do not obstruct already made world building about ruling structure/culture.
Also, to remind you of this gem:
Spoiler:
As the faction is AFAIK unmaintained, I don't know who else should do this but the community!? Your argument about existing campaigns is a fair one (haven't played RftA, is it about Khalifate?), I raised similar concerns in relation to Oath of Allegiance, which is why I argued for options like Dunefolk, which do not obstruct already made world building about ruling structure/culture.
Under blood-red skies, an old man sits
In the ruins of Carthage - contemplating prophecy.
In the ruins of Carthage - contemplating prophecy.