[mainline] Red mages naming
Moderator: Forum Moderators
Forum rules
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Before posting a new idea, you must read the following:
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
I think the main problem some of them would run into is that they already use Magister. Possibly as a name for the basic mage form as that is what it means in other langauges.
"There are two kinds of old men in the world. The kind who didn't go to war and who say that they should have lived fast died young and left a handsome corpse and the old men who did go to war and who say that there is no such thing as a handsome corpse."
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Just because redundancy exists, does not mean you have to keep duplicating it elsewhere.James_The_Invisible wrote:We already have (human) Ranger and Elvish Ranger ...
The first two would be good for a level 1, and savant could go for 2 or 3, but would not fit in well with the current line if just the level 3 name is being replaced.Ranger wrote:What about: neophyte; acolyte; savant;? I'm leaning towards acolyte.
A good point, though even human mages would spend years/decades in study, and compared to his seniors, he could still just be an apprentice as he is most likely still learning from the level 2s, 3s, and 4s.Paulomat4 wrote:Well, I don't think we should change the first two level name. I like to think of the first mage as kind of student who already got his bachelor. He is a mage, but not a pro. So don't call him initiate or apprentice.
When it became pertinent to consider the impact of the name on the entire line as they all should make sense from one to the next.Xalzar wrote:When did we shift the topic from the 3rd and 4th leves of the Mage line?
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
- StandYourGround
- Posts: 256
- Joined: May 13th, 2009, 2:16 am
- Location: On a blue ball spinning through space at incomprehensible speed
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
As long as we're reinventing the wheel, we might as well throw in a different advancement path for the Silver Mage, or whatever it ends up being named. So when you promote a level 1 Mage (or Initiate), you can decide whether it follows the path of Fire, Light, or "Wind"... Oh why not? Let's even throw in the Shadow Mage line from Liberty for good measure. Seems most of the time you have mages, you're usually fighting against the powers that be anyway.
Oooh, time to brainstorm!
Start with Initiate, then choose a path:
Well, that was fun to write. Any thoughts?
Oooh, time to brainstorm!
Start with Initiate, then choose a path:
Path of Fire
Path of Light
Path of Wind
Path of Shadow
I will now resume lurking silently.
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
I like the idea of having multiple paths open to a mage based on how they may have chosen to focus their studies. Outside of establishing naming conventions, the only hurdle for this would be the two new-ish lines (as two are basic alterations of the existing choices). The Wind line would need a L2 unit to get to the Silver Mage and both the Wind and Shadow lines would introduce level 2 units into a default faction that would have ramifications for multiplayer.StandYourGround wrote:As long as we're reinventing the wheel...
Well, that was fun to write. Any thoughts?
I suppose you could write the unit files so that they could be made unavailable for multiplayer, and it's not as if all units available to a race are available in multiplayer.
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
- StandYourGround
- Posts: 256
- Joined: May 13th, 2009, 2:16 am
- Location: On a blue ball spinning through space at incomprehensible speed
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Yeah, this would really rock the MP boat if used like that. Having more options would make sense only in a long campaign.
Edit: You could even have some fun in MP though... Suppose Loyalists can only get Fire and Light, while Rebels can only get Light or Wind... It would make sense that the Wind line would be more easily approachable by the elves anyway, i.e. like they are in AoI.
Edit: You could even have some fun in MP though... Suppose Loyalists can only get Fire and Light, while Rebels can only get Light or Wind... It would make sense that the Wind line would be more easily approachable by the elves anyway, i.e. like they are in AoI.
I will now resume lurking silently.
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
In order to cut out from derailing the name change thought process, if you wanted to flesh this out more in a separate thread...? Perhaps with unit descriptions/stats/etc. in order to see exactly what it would look like for the new tree idea.StandYourGround wrote:Yeah, this would really rock the MP boat if used like that. Having more options would make sense only in a long campaign.
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Gentlemen,
I believe I have the solution to your problems. Most of the red-line mages are named just fine, but we simply replace the level 4 unit name, in order to not "rock the boat" too much. We have to work with years of lore and MP balance, so this is not something to be taken lightly. Gentlemen, I humbly submit the following name, if you deign to consider it:
Mega Mage.
I believe I have the solution to your problems. Most of the red-line mages are named just fine, but we simply replace the level 4 unit name, in order to not "rock the boat" too much. We have to work with years of lore and MP balance, so this is not something to be taken lightly. Gentlemen, I humbly submit the following name, if you deign to consider it:
Mega Mage.
BfW 1.12 supported, but active development only for BfW 1.13/1.14: Bad Moon Rising | Trinity | Archaic Era |
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
“Mage”, “Magus”, “Magister”… these are much too similar. I would be confused which would advance to which.
- In Ascension, I used the name Epic Mage to describe a mage higher than Great Mage.
- Taking a page from WotC, I see High Mage and Magelord that could possibly work.
Mage > Red Mage > Crimson Mage > Arch Mage
Wesnoth Bestiary ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Unit tree and stat browser
Canvas ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Exp. map viewer
Unit tree and stat browser
Canvas ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Exp. map viewer
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Fair enough.Paulomat4 wrote:Well, I don't think we should change the first two level name. I like to think of the first mage as kind of student who already got his bachelor. He is a mage, but not a pro. So don't call him initiate or apprentice.
Red mage fits together with the white mage and the dark sorcerer. So that shouldn't be changed too.
The third and fourth lvl advancements are the ones who cause confusion, so lets focus on them. I personaly lrefer beetlenauts "mage of flame" and for the fourth level "archmage"
[sarcarsm]Of course it is, and its not like we can change something else like resistances or special abilities.[/sarcasm]Let's not go overboard here. A 16x4 fire attack is one of the strongest ingame. So no need to be changed
EDIT: What I mean is that his damage isnt the problem. The problem is his lack of mobility and resilience for a 4th lvl unit.
If he would have more of the the first or the second (or a bit of both) it would make me a very happy panda.
Yeah, lets take a bland name and replace it with another bland name, just for the sake of it!doofus-01 wrote:Gentlemen,
I believe I have the solution to your problems. Most of the red-line mages are named just fine, but we simply replace the level 4 unit name, in order to not "rock the boat" too much. We have to work with years of lore and MP balance, so this is not something to be taken lightly. Gentlemen, I humbly submit the following name, if you deign to consider it:
Mega Mage.
Personally I dislike using colors to describe Mages. Its just seems so unimmaginative. But I understand, that by now everyone who plays Wesnoth is used to distinguish various human mages by their colors.ancestral wrote:“Mage”, “Magus”, “Magister”… these are much too similar. I would be confused which would advance to which.
Otherwise… we have Silver Mage as Level 3. Maybe it wouldn't be bad using a color word for the Red line for Level 3, such as Crimson Mage (and then make Arch Mage Level 4). That's my best suggestion:
- In Ascension, I used the name Epic Mage to describe a mage higher than Great Mage.
- Taking a page from WotC, I see High Mage and Magelord that could possibly work.
Mage > Red Mage > Crimson Mage > Arch Mage
So while I have in mind possible alternative names for all mages, for now I just want to deal with "Archmage" title problem.
While we dont need a 5th level mage name, the other ones...
Well High Mage is just a mundane naming of ArchMage and Magelord sounds more like a title of a Warlock than a Schoolar.
If the Archmage is going to become the name for the 4th level Red Mage we would need a new name for the 3rd level.
IMHO the term Magister would fit nicely for his supposed role into the hierarchy of magi of Wesnoth.
Calling a spear a spoon and then saying "our spoons are different, WINR," is kind of unsatisfying, isn't it?
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Just for the record, I've never felt there was anything odd about the lvl3 and lvl4 names. I've always assumed that "Arch Mage" is more of a title, signifying that they're pretty much at the top in everyday internal mage hierarchy, and that the Red Mage line overall represents the most common, general scholarly wizardry. That there are rare inviduals (Great Mages) who surpass them in skill and authority doesn't mean that the name "Arch Mage" is undeserved.
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
I’d greatly prefer if we didn’t have to change any names, because that inevitably causes trouble for us UMC authors. But if you really, absolutely need to do it, swapping one of the names will cause problems for everybody because it’s not a trivial operation for
wmllint
to do — it has no way to know, unassisted, whether a piece of WML has already been updated for a new Wesnoth version, leading to a chicken-and-egg situation. “Is this code referring to the L3 Arch Mage, or the new L4 Arch Mage?”Author of the unofficial UtBS sequels Invasion from the Unknown and After the Storm.
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
So if it was ever to be done, it would need to be a change and not a swap, that makes sense.shadowm wrote:I’d greatly prefer if we didn’t have to change any names, because that inevitably causes trouble for us UMC authors. But if you really, absolutely need to do it, swapping one of the names will cause problems for everybody because it’s not a trivial operation forwmllint
to do — it has no way to know, unassisted, whether a piece of WML has already been updated for a new Wesnoth version, leading to a chicken-and-egg situation. “Is this code referring to the L3 Arch Mage, or the new L4 Arch Mage?”
Mainline Maintainer: AOI, DM, NR, TB and THoT.
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
UMC Maintainer: Forward They Cried, A Few Logs, A Few More Logs, Start of the War, and Battle Against Time
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Good point. That triggered memories of when the Drake line got changed up and new names were used all around instead.shadowm wrote:I’d greatly prefer if we didn’t have to change any names, because that inevitably causes trouble for us UMC authors. But if you really, absolutely need to do it, swapping one of the names will cause problems for everybody because it’s not a trivial operation forwmllint
to do — it has no way to know, unassisted, whether a piece of WML has already been updated for a new Wesnoth version, leading to a chicken-and-egg situation. “Is this code referring to the L3 Arch Mage, or the new L4 Arch Mage?”
(FWIW I don't mind "Great Mage" myself.)
Wesnoth Bestiary ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Unit tree and stat browser
Canvas ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Exp. map viewer
Unit tree and stat browser
Canvas ( PREVIEW IT HERE )
Exp. map viewer
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Mage -> Arch Mage -> Sage?
Re: [mainline] Red mages naming
Until now, I take names as they are and never think about any change, but as the subject is open I look at the Mage line and I agree something is wrong.
A beginner (not existing): Student lvl 0 always intelligent, without any spell. Really needed?
Mage lvl 1 is ok. It shouldn't be fire but a more generic one, something not really defined like energy that can become fire, light, holly or whatever later.
Arch and Great should be linked to fire. Fire, then Sun, Nova, Magma, Nuclear ... Novage, Atomage, Magmage, Nucleage?
Silver isn't good either. Zap, Flash? Whatever related to teleport ability.
Red and White seems fine. If any change, Fire and Holly?
Arch and Great should master more than one spell path.
Only my thought.
I bet: Mage, Red Mage, Fire Mage and MagMage. And Flash Mage ...
Magister is a war plane! (France)
A beginner (not existing): Student lvl 0 always intelligent, without any spell. Really needed?
Mage lvl 1 is ok. It shouldn't be fire but a more generic one, something not really defined like energy that can become fire, light, holly or whatever later.
Arch and Great should be linked to fire. Fire, then Sun, Nova, Magma, Nuclear ... Novage, Atomage, Magmage, Nucleage?
Silver isn't good either. Zap, Flash? Whatever related to teleport ability.
Red and White seems fine. If any change, Fire and Holly?
Arch and Great should master more than one spell path.
Only my thought.
I bet: Mage, Red Mage, Fire Mage and MagMage. And Flash Mage ...
Magister is a war plane! (France)