The Battle for Wesnoth Forums

Good guide ! I agree with almost everything you said, though I have a few remarks. Knalgans vs Drakes Dwarvish Thunderer: Good at attacking drakes. Can defend against augers in the open. Just as slow as fighters, however slightly more useful overall. I think it is not only slightly, but much more us...

Yeah, I guess you're right, though I would like to note that all of those units have weaknesses, it depends v which faction they have levelled, the Wraith can die quite easily by a mage, and yet with dwarves it is more complicated to kill one. WM, Red Mage, Berserker, ... , can also die quite easily...

Hehe, indeed it is hard to level up one, though in longer matches it can be quite frequent if you give the xp to the right unit and protect it. But all that really depends on the game. This idea came from a personal experience, where I found it very hard even to attack at night, with orcs, because o...

Wintermute, I understand that levelling a drake gets you an enormous advantage, but v some factions "constant" drake leadership can be much more annoying than any other lvl2s. Man....I hate seeing all those burners level into flares in my 1v1s and 2v2s. I guess I shouldn't put my units in ...

I am saying leadership should still be available, only as leader. Second, I didn't say it because it is "nice", I said it because it isn't balanced in my opinion, telling why it isn't as well. However, please argument my points as well before just telling me it is "fine" as the w...

Let me explain myself. I think if Drake Flare is used as a normal unit, it gives a too big advantage for drakes. When Drake Flare is a leader, your leadership won't be used "all" the time, because you'll need to constantly go back to recruit, and to protect it. So you will still use leader...

914: When you fail to kill an adept with an ulf :D (Many of the ideas I've read are just ideas about "You've been reading these forums too long when" and have no sense for this topic - for ex. almost 1/3 are, you've read 44 pages of this topic, you've posted here, you feel excited about po...

Indeed, I see ulf "always" kills adept, though my 0.3% was taken from Wesnoth itself (99.97% to kill, .3% to leave 3hp -adept at 40%), and it seemed strange to me too though I did not calculate exact chance of killing. So if I understand well, making an exception in RNG for ulf v adept can...

(I don't know if this has been posted before, apologies if it is the case). It came to my mind that it would be more fair, if, when you kill a defenceless unit (an adept for example) with an ulfserker or berserker, you would recieve 0% inflicted for it. Indeed, I do not complain at all about the luc...

IMO in this case, before banning him one could just have told him to change his name & not to enter again with such nicks. I'm pretty sure he would have understood it. Or a warning kick. Direct ban is abusive (in my opinion).

IMO Noy is fair, although he is rude (constantly frustrated ?) towards those he does not know.
His bans are just although sometimes I wish he wouldn't speak to others like he does.

*Signs*
I find it tends to delete diversity of the factions, and it tends to make human archer, instead of being it special, just like any other archer (easily attackable by melee).

Golbeeze, if I complete your arena survival with "EE+EOM" or "EE" or "EOM", can I still be in the list of "champions"? Another thing, you should do a better "surprise" because when I think about it, all that hard work, all those retries,all that comb...