Search found 12 matches

by warren
July 6th, 2009, 4:02 am
Forum: Release Announcements, Compiling & Installation
Topic: Wesnoth 1.6.3
Replies: 8
Views: 3882

Re: Wesnoth 1.6.3

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packa ... oth/1.6.4/
Packages for Fedora 10, 11 and 12 are built. Currently untested.
by warren
June 29th, 2009, 8:15 pm
Forum: Release Announcements, Compiling & Installation
Topic: Wesnoth 1.6.3
Replies: 8
Views: 3882

Re: Wesnoth 1.6.3

Hmm, is that issue noted above about multiplayer disconnect bad enough that I should not push 1.6.3 to our users? We currently have 1.6.2.
by warren
June 29th, 2009, 12:09 am
Forum: Release Announcements, Compiling & Installation
Topic: Wesnoth 1.6.3
Replies: 8
Views: 3882

Re: Wesnoth 1.6.3

http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/wesnoth/1.6.3/ Official Fedora 10, 11 and 12 builds of wesnoth-1.6.3 are available for testing. They will soon be pushed to the updates repository, however it would be good to get some actual testing. (in related news, is there a way we can receive notifica...
by warren
December 31st, 2008, 7:33 pm
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: gcc-4.3 and ogg test
Replies: 2
Views: 999

Re: gcc-4.3 and ogg test

The patches are named by the version we added them, but they still apply to wesnoth-1.4.7. OK, you were correct about gcc-4.3 builds working fine. It seems upstream fixed this someplace else already. Regarding the ogg-test, does Mix_LoadMUS() try to play the sound via the sound device? If so this ca...
by warren
December 28th, 2008, 8:47 pm
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: gcc-4.3 and ogg test
Replies: 2
Views: 999

gcc-4.3 and ogg test

http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/wesnoth/devel/wesnoth-1.2.8-gcc43.patch?view=log Could something like this be added to the upstream source? It is necessary to build Wesnoth with gcc-4.3+. Should be harmless with earlier compilers. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/wesnoth/devel/wesno...
by warren
April 22nd, 2008, 1:27 am
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

What are you using instead of autotools?
by warren
April 21st, 2008, 7:18 pm
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

I have no idea what your "package pool" is. It is possible to have the same package across multiple Fedora distributions if we do a manual "tagging" in our database and hardlink of the packages across the directories. We do this very rarely because it isn't worth it except in a few cases like huge g...
by warren
April 21st, 2008, 11:51 am
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

It really makes me wonder, is the deb format really that superior to RPM that RPM isn't able to produce from a single tarball different binary packages that are partly arch dependent and partly not? You missed a point. I can make the data noarch, but that alone is insufficient if I want to share th...
by warren
April 21st, 2008, 2:53 am
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

please make sure that the Makefile builds and installs without error in the absence of data.
[/quote]

A simpler way to implement this might be to require a non-default variable to allow install to succeed without data. Something like:

make install NODATA=yes
by warren
April 21st, 2008, 1:38 am
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

If i understood correctly the problem: The architecture independent data is indeed something like 99% of our tarball and it is something that you'll unlikely repackage differently in another distributions (especially since they are similar). Thank you, you understood all of it. - it's quite trivial...
by warren
April 20th, 2008, 1:48 pm
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Re: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

Strange, the Debian packager already manages to offer split build. There is no need for you to explicitly follow the structure of the tarball for the binary. Just do split the stuff, it is only a "per folder work". JUst have a look at how Debian splits the stuff, there it *does* work nicely: And ye...
by warren
April 19th, 2008, 11:40 pm
Forum: Coder’s Corner
Topic: Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split
Replies: 15
Views: 2769

Proposal: Code and Data Tarball Split

Hi folks, We ship wesnoth in Fedora repositories for four architectures (i386, x86_64, ppc, ppc64). We currently ship wesnoth in three current Fedora distributions (F-7, F-8 and F-9) and two EPEL distributions (EPEL-4 and EPEL-5). Each uses ~722MB of mirror space for wesnoth. wesnoth*.i386.rpm 145MB...